Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in the new charter

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 27 January 2016 19:48 UTC

To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
References: <1180854650.10280415.1453494609345.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1180854650.10280415.1453494609345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <56A61EE7.6070406@innovationslab.net> <8e5032c92a0a40a68c33a414f649afc8@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <56A91F0A.80402@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:48:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8e5032c92a0a40a68c33a414f649afc8@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ggag8pVGOdWbw94cgCQQHgwvukDEiX0ht"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/C5o6Dc_n7jIyREE2fMfzN5tdIi0>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in the new charter
Precedence: list

Hi Pascal,

On 1/27/16 2:38 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> Hello Brian and Qin:
> 
> We discussed that at the time of the first charter, using RFC 3444 as
> our reference; it is my understanding that we aimed the 6top
> interface document
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-interface at
> providing a Yang Data model to manage the 6top layer in a device. It
> is my understanding that some form of information model in natural
> language would be present in the 6top draft, but my reading of the
> 6top interface is that there is some degree of information model
> there too, that explains the data model. If so, is that a problem?

I don't think the problem is in a *document*. Benoit is questioning the
wording of the proposed charter.  I would suggest reviewing his comments
in light of the current wording of the new charter text.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-6tisch/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-6tisch/ballot/#benoit-claise

Regards,
Brian

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Pascal
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: 6tisch
>> [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman Sent:
>> lundi 25 janvier 2016 14:11 To: 6tisch@ietf.org Subject: Re:
>> [6tisch] information model or data model in the new charter
>> 
>> Hi Qin,
>> 
>> On 1/22/16 3:30 PM, Qin Wang wrote:
>>> Dear all, In today's Webex meeting, we were talking about the
>>> feedback from Bonoit about the new Charter, see [6tisch] Benoit
>>> Claise's No Objection on charter-ietf-6tisch-01-00: (with
>>> COMMENT), and want to continue the discussion in the ML. The
>>> question is what is exactly we want to do with Yang model, and
>>> how to make the paragraph about Yang model in the new Charter
>>> more accurate. Any comments and suggestion is welcome. ThanksQin
>>> 
>> 
>> This issue needs to get resolved before I will release the charter
>> for external review. Benoit's point illustrated an issue in the
>> charter where it is not clear as to whether the WG is interested in
>> an information model or a data model.
>> 
>> Regards, Brian

Attachment: signature.asc

[6tisch] information model or data model in the n… Qin Wang
Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in t… Brian Haberman
Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in t… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in t… Brian Haberman
Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in t… Qin Wang
Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in t… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)

Re: [6tisch] information model or data model in the new charter

Attachment: signature.asc