IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tisch] frame pending bit - Re: Questions on TSCH CSMA-CA retransmission algorithm in IEEE 802.15.4-2015

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Tue, 11 December 2018 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676C8130DCF for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:13:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fT-SJNc8vao6 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:13:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0A7130DC9 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBBADJhb005595 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:13:19 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.2/8.14.8/Submit) id wBBADJs1014485; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:13:19 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23567.36287.544539.499545@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:13:19 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Yasuyuki Tanaka <yasuyuki.tanaka@inria.fr>
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4F522115-722D-422E-9857-D09DC90B79EE@inria.fr>
References: <FC00A9BD-16FC-4E54-8B73-C76CAA035138@inria.fr> <23338.24307.310204.951524@fireball.acr.fi> <3DD8D1A9-9A2C-4D95-A8F5-3773F2E3FF53@inria.fr> <4C7D8FC5-1228-4693-8A8F-F24AF5765F6B@inria.fr> <23340.65260.93293.26087@fireball.acr.fi> <51985800-E995-438D-A691-00B483C7CBD0@inria.fr> <B1743E04-02E9-4A90-9C36-7CBD6B4A9ADF@inria.fr> <23480.4019.122928.340023@fireball.acr.fi> <4F522115-722D-422E-9857-D09DC90B79EE@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 25.1.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 4 min
X-Total-Time: 3 min
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/clbxEY1hW5keBcrgiszaP44OUhY>
Subject: [6tisch] frame pending bit - Re: Questions on TSCH CSMA-CA retransmission algorithm in IEEE 802.15.4-2015
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:13:26 -0000

Yasuyuki Tanaka writes:
> Is there any update on CID 93? I checked LB150 Consolidated Comments
> (rev.12)[1], but the item for CID 93 is filtered out for some
> reason...
> 
> [1] https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/18/15-18-0433-12-04md-lb150-consolidated-comments.xlsx

While we are working on the sheet we quite often filter comments in
some way, i.e., only show those do not have any resolution yet, and go
through them. CID 93 has been marked as Defer and was assigned to
person taking care of most of the other TSCH comments too. We try to
go through all comments once before coming back to the comments we
have deferred or postponed for later. We have now managed to go
through the main letter ballot comments once, and moved to go through
the rogue comments once before coming back to finish those comments we
skipped over.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email