IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-16: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 11 May 2020 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFFC3A0811; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3PhVuWka_HrT; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6427E3A07D0; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 04BFaD77010796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 May 2020 11:36:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:12 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@inria.fr>
Cc: "Pascal Thubert, pthubert" <pthubert@cisco.com>, tengfei chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>, iesg <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6tisch-msf <draft-ietf-6tisch-msf@ietf.org>, 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>, 6tisch-chairs <6tisch-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200511153612.GN27494@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <158588511619.26351.4149213511250395502@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAdgstQ8QfXg5TtL30vqL38C=Ey8Qaa0RT2Gzd_at1pBhQOaeA@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35651B029F7998BC4EE7CDBBD8A10@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <350915165.1841546.1589209223906.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <350915165.1841546.1589209223906.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/dIGsTaxxw520SvYliU2h_iP0sbM>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:36:28 -0000

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 05:00:23PM +0200, Tengfei Chang wrote:
> Hi Pascal, 
> 
> If comparing the comments to draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-12 from another thread previously, you will find out they are actually the same. 

Yes, they are the same; I had tried to indicate that with "Original COMMENT
section preserved below (possibly stale)."

Sorry for making you do the extra work of checking against the old
comments.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email