[6tisch] 答复: T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt

"Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)" <satish.anamalamudi@huawei.com> Fri, 10 June 2016 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <satish.anamalamudi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C5912D51B for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 02:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwVhT91ijObr for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 02:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE2B012D518 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 02:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CQN93295; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:22:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.34) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:22:01 +0100
Received: from SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.174]) by SZXEMI402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.83.65.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:21:56 +0800
From: "Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)" <satish.anamalamudi@huawei.com>
To: Xavi Vilajosana Guillén <xvilajosana@uoc.edu>, "S.V.R.Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRwvAuAVDs3Zyw80ayIa7IZlMlm5/ia85g
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:21:55 +0000
Message-ID: <BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6CC8F@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6BE9E@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <006a01d1c249$11cfb080$356f1180$@cdac.in> <BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6CA73@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <2060328037.1669837.1465497395212.JavaMail.root@vilafranca.uoc.es> <CAC9+vPhoi87gLVZ+ge3MC-NcmwW-UrbhNcWMaCR+2srQ=XF21g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC9+vPhoi87gLVZ+ge3MC-NcmwW-UrbhNcWMaCR+2srQ=XF21g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.109.110.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6CC8FSZXEMI507MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.575A86BE.00AE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.174, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 490d7903f63637c9d3100473cf930c50
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/eLf9zUTYAj5IuuYX9MMFnnrlP2E>
Cc: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: [6tisch] 答复: T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:22:14 -0000

Hello Xavi,

alternately, we can take SDN approach whereby we can think of a virtual RSVP
protocol instance running in the PCE instead of on the motes. The PCE can
install the resources over CoAP messages. When track timeout is detected by the PCE
via a network monitoring entity NME, it can take back the resources by sending
teardown message to the nodes.  This way the resource reservation protocol overhead has been
off-loaded to PCE.

With Regards,
Satish.
发件人: Xavi Vilajosana Guillén [mailto:xvilajosana@uoc.edu]
发送时间: 2016年6月10日 16:15
收件人: S.V.R.Anand
抄送: Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi); Lijo Thomas; 6tisch@ietf.org
主题: Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt

Hi,

in protocols such as RSVP the tracks are maintained by refresh message and a node timeout. Every time a refresh message is relayed through the track the freshness counter is updated. If a track timeout is detected in a node the node releases the resources. Nodes send periodic refreshing to maintain tracks in a best effort way. Any node can sent at any time a tear down message to terminate the track.

I think this idea can be extended and applied here.

regards,
Xavi


2016-06-09 20:35 GMT+02:00 S.V.R.Anand <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in<mailto:anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>>:
Hi Lijo,

Your question on the lifetime of a TrackID can be split into two sub-questions.

One relates to the time itself, and the other is the track termination procedure. A
short answer to the first is, it is application specific. The second is more
involved as there are several ways of terminating a track.

(i) One of the P2P end nodes can signal the PCE via a teardown message so that
PCE can release the chunks allocated to the intermediate nodes during the
resource reservation. The flip side of this seemingly graceful way is that if
there are plenty of short-lived tracks in the network, then the network will be
loaded with many control messages, not desirable in LLNs (ii) PCE automatically
reclaim the chunks based on the degree of idleness based on the information
obtained from NME. There is a trade-off here too.

Hope the above addresses your question.

Anand



On Thursday 09 June 2016 06:20 PM, Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi) wrote:
> Hello Lijo, > > Thank you for your questions. > > Main role of TrackID : > 1. Track forwarding is very similar to IP forwarding where each and every hop is related to local Track-ID (like IP address) to switch the tracks towards Destination. Later, cells are used as implicit labels to switch it to next-hop cells of associated Track-ID. > 2. To identify the associated L2-bundles at each and every hop to forward the data to next-hop neighbors and dynamically adapt the cells in associated L2-bundles. > > As of now I don't have exact answer for "Life time of a TrackID". I will message to you very soon once I know the answer for it. > > With Regards, > Satish.  > -----®öŸö----- > Ñöº: Lijo Thomas [mailto:lijo@cdac.in] > Ñ öô: 2016t6 9å 20:19 > 6öº: Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi); 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > ;˜: RE: [6tisch] FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt > > Hi Satish, > > I have a couple of queries regarding the SF1 draft . > > 1. In the draft it says a TrackID is generated for each 1 hop communication. > I had a feeling that the TrackID remains the same for an end-to-end packet flow.  Please correct me if I am wrong > > 2. Life time of a TrackID > > Hope these are relevant to your draft  : > > Thanks & Regards, > Lijo Thomas > > > -----Original Message----- > From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi) > Sent: 06 June 2016 15:31 > To: 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > Subject: [6tisch] FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt > > Hello everyone, > > A new draft is proposed for hop-by-hop scheduling through Scheduling Function One(SF1). Your comments are highly appreciated. > > With Regards, > Satish. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> Sent: 2016t6 6å 17:54 >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> >> Subject: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> >> >>         Title           : Scheduling Function One (SF1) for hop-by-hop >> Scheduling in 6tisch Networks >>         Authors         : Satish Anamalamudi >>                           Mingui Zhang >>                           Charles E. Perkins >>                           S.V.R Anand >>     Filename        : draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt >>     Pages           : 10 >>     Date            : 2016-06-06 >> >> Abstract: >>    This document defines a 6top Scheduling Function called "Scheduling >>    Function One" (SF1) to schedule end-to-end dedicated L2-bundles hop- >>    by-hop for each instance.  In addition, SF1 dynamically adapts the >>    number of reserved cells in scheduled end-to-end L2-bundles of an >>    ongoing instance through a Resource Reservation Protocol.  SF1 uses >>    the 6P signaling messages with a TrackID to add/delete cells in end- >>    to-end L2-bundles of each instance. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1/ >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce mailing list >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org<mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] > > This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch


_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch



--
Dr. Xavier Vilajosana Guillén­
Research Professor
Wireless Networks Research Group
Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya­

+34 646 633 681| xvilajosana@uoc.edu<mailto:xvilajosana@uoc.edu>­ | Skype­: xvilajosana
http://xvilajosana.org
http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu/

Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 5. Edifici B3
08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona)

[http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/wine_LOGO_small2-e1453363995864.png]

­