Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt
"S.V.R.Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in> Fri, 10 June 2016 08:32 UTC
Return-Path: <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3FC12DAB5 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.026
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.026 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nSSat_etSNrT for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.iisc.ernet.in (relay.iisc.ernet.in [203.200.35.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EA1BC12D0B2 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ece.iisc.ernet.in (ece.iisc.ernet.in [10.32.1.10]) by relay.iisc.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E99AE08D6; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:02:18 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [10.32.14.64] ([10.32.14.64]) by ece.iisc.ernet.in (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u5A8XFaw009226; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:03:15 +0530
To: Xavi Vilajosana Guillén <xvilajosana@uoc.edu>
References: <BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6BE9E@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <006a01d1c249$11cfb080$356f1180$@cdac.in> <BC1182E86737A7438C540E3B93DB7E5120B6CA73@SZXEMI507-MBS.china.huawei.com> <2060328037.1669837.1465497395212.JavaMail.root@vilafranca.uoc.es> <CAC9+vPhoi87gLVZ+ge3MC-NcmwW-UrbhNcWMaCR+2srQ=XF21g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "S.V.R.Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <575A7B0C.7050108@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:02:12 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC9+vPhoi87gLVZ+ge3MC-NcmwW-UrbhNcWMaCR+2srQ=XF21g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010704070503000904030403"
X-IISc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact nethelp@serc.iisc.in for more information
X-IISc-MailScanner-ID: 43E99AE08D6.AC199
X-IISc-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IISc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.314, required 6.5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, NO_RDNS2 0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD -1.43, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00)
X-IISc-MailScanner-From: anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in
MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1466152339.5103@Q3zgI0jwdhoQHUrnj6c8mA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/t2mFFy0xqzZSF8xnUCEM7sDfkV4>
Cc: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)" <satish.anamalamudi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:32:30 -0000
Hi Xavi, Yes, I agree. For LLNs, I suppose we might need to adapt RSVP suitably. In my mail I tried to weigh the options with RSVP in mind. Anand On Friday 10 June 2016 01:45 PM, Xavi Vilajosana Guillén wrote: > Hi, > > in protocols such as RSVP the tracks are maintained by refresh message > and a node timeout. Every time a refresh message is relayed through > the track the freshness counter is updated. If a track timeout is > detected in a node the node releases the resources. Nodes send > periodic refreshing to maintain tracks in a best effort way. Any node > can sent at any time a tear down message to terminate the track. > > I think this idea can be extended and applied here. > > regards, > Xavi > > > 2016-06-09 20:35 GMT+02:00 S.V.R.Anand <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in > <mailto:anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>>: > > Hi Lijo, > > Your question on the lifetime of a TrackID can be split into two > sub-questions. > > One relates to the time itself, and the other is the track > termination procedure. A > short answer to the first is, it is application specific. The > second is more > involved as there are several ways of terminating a track. > > (i) One of the P2P end nodes can signal the PCE via a teardown > message so that > PCE can release the chunks allocated to the intermediate nodes > during the > resource reservation. The flip side of this seemingly graceful way > is that if > there are plenty of short-lived tracks in the network, then the > network will be > loaded with many control messages, not desirable in LLNs (ii) PCE > automatically > reclaim the chunks based on the degree of idleness based on the > information > obtained from NME. There is a trade-off here too. > > Hope the above addresses your question. > > Anand > > > > On Thursday 09 June 2016 06:20 PM, Satish Anamalamudi (Satish > Anamalamudi) wrote: > > Hello Lijo, > > Thank you for your questions. > > Main role of TrackID : > 1. > Track forwarding is very similar to IP forwarding where each and > every hop is related to local Track-ID (like IP address) to switch > the tracks towards Destination. Later, cells are used as implicit > labels to switch it to next-hop cells of associated Track-ID. > 2. > To identify the associated L2-bundles at each and every hop to > forward the data to next-hop neighbors and dynamically adapt the > cells in associated L2-bundles. > > As of now I don't have exact > answer for "Life time of a TrackID". I will message to you very > soon once I know the answer for it. > > With Regards, > Satish. > > -----®öŸö----- > Ñöº: Lijo Thomas [mailto:lijo@cdac.in] > Ñ öô: > 2016t6 9å 20:19 > 6öº: Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi); > 6tisch@ietf.org <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > ;˜: RE: [6tisch] FW: > I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt > > Hi Satish, > > > I have a couple of queries regarding the SF1 draft . > > 1. In the > draft it says a TrackID is generated for each 1 hop communication. > > I had a feeling that the TrackID remains the same for an > end-to-end packet flow. Please correct me if I am wrong > > 2. > Life time of a TrackID > > Hope these are relevant to your draft > : > > Thanks & Regards, > Lijo Thomas > > > -----Original > Message----- > From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi) > Sent: 06 June > 2016 15:31 > To: 6tisch@ietf.org <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > > Subject: [6tisch] FW: I-D Action: > draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt > > Hello everyone, > > A new > draft is proposed for hop-by-hop scheduling through Scheduling > Function One(SF1). Your comments are highly appreciated. > > With > Regards, > Satish. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: > I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > >> internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> > Sent: 2016t6 6å 17:54 >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> >> Subject: I-D Action: > draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft > is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> > >> >> Title : Scheduling Function One (SF1) for > hop-by-hop >> Scheduling in 6tisch Networks >> > Authors : Satish Anamalamudi >> > Mingui Zhang >> Charles E. Perkins > >> S.V.R Anand >> Filename : > draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00.txt >> Pages : 10 >> > Date : 2016-06-06 >> >> Abstract: >> This > document defines a 6top Scheduling Function called "Scheduling > >> Function One" (SF1) to schedule end-to-end dedicated > L2-bundles hop- >> by-hop for each instance. In addition, SF1 > dynamically adapts the >> number of reserved cells in scheduled > end-to-end L2-bundles of an >> ongoing instance through a > Resource Reservation Protocol. SF1 uses >> the 6P signaling > messages with a TrackID to add/delete cells in end- >> to-end > L2-bundles of each instance. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status > page for this draft is: >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1/ >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-satish-6tisch-6top-sf1-00 >> >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time > of >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available > at >> tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce > mailing list >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org > <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or >> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing > list > 6tisch@ietf.org <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: > Facebook: > https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] > > > This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply > e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any > unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, > printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and > appropriate legal action will be taken. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch > mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > -- > Dr. Xavier Vilajosana Guillén > Research Professor > Wireless Networks Research Group > Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3) > Universitat Oberta de Catalunya > > +34 646 633 681| xvilajosana@uoc.edu <mailto:xvilajosana@uoc.edu> > | Skype: xvilajosana > http://xvilajosana.org <http://xvilajosana.org> > http://wine.rdi.uoc.edu/ > > Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia > Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 5. Edifici B3 > 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona) > > > >
- [6tisch] FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-6top… Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)
- Re: [6tisch] FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-… Lijo Thomas
- [6tisch] 答复: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tisch-… Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)
- Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tis… S.V.R.Anand
- Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tis… Lijo Thomas
- Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tis… Xavi Vilajosana Guillén
- Re: [6tisch] T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tis… S.V.R.Anand
- [6tisch] 答复: T: FW: I-D Action: draft-satish-6tis… Satish Anamalamudi (Satish Anamalamudi)