IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Extending CoJP (minimal-security) for non-6TiSCH 802.15.4 networks

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sun, 19 September 2021 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018553A3A56 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wetziWyGoXSV for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F161F3A3A54 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 12:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (cpe788a207f397a-cmbc4dfb96bb50.sdns.net.rogers.com [174.116.121.43]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2679D1F448; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:48:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id EA18A1A0529; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 15:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>, 6tisch@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <YUcakTFqibo5wEfe@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <YUcakTFqibo5wEfe@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com> message dated "Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:10:09 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 15:48:44 -0400
Message-ID: <102718.1632080924@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/fo-3CmyO9jiiW5sgSbpKh42b1QQ>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Extending CoJP (minimal-security) for non-6TiSCH 802.15.4 networks
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 19:48:56 -0000

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
    > have the discussions in the development of CoJP ever sidetracked to its
    > applicability for non-TSCH setups?

not really.

    > Parameters registry could suffice to make CoJP usable for DSME, NBE or
    > BE (CAP / CSMA/CA) modes.

I think that the CoJP worked very very hard to keep it at one round trip.

This is due to congestion concerns further up the RPL tree.
I don't perceive that these other technologies have this problem to the same
degree.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email