IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03

Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571D21202AF for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VI1GCitz7kcU for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08C312004B for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id w25so7434684pfi.9 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JAvqlqoh2q2v2CDMTY+Mcm8Bwu4vSZew2rv0P9i13UA=; b=QMvHYdiFKDoPyPRy0NkFkbL2at2kNllY5QgfP1+c5OmvyAX6UEyqKb+3Xhf7eciuFa BQnFk26aJvyAe60ZPcyI+8wGMGPayj5IO8HP6In03Ewc5khJ+8ogQB0GOCHAjdPMvywA MHDRAgJaFZ9y8+j64CQo7Nf99xaEz07geMXsr/wnF4VvlQNtCjjqcq0VGLwbchaj8bIg OZtfRNatwfRzl76CFErSP9uhrJi3aBXiBCykjp6o7HtNxCX4ZCRqqLkePB3JieZukhaB o3m4d1CBoD832o1riZAZ88rSv/CwuXyvhV30wBFoj+CAxqePhazLRuw2lAoNPI0FpAbp l9CQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JAvqlqoh2q2v2CDMTY+Mcm8Bwu4vSZew2rv0P9i13UA=; b=ZgPHC1QjwGNYSO/P+6oAJ3DxDZLL+6OtYjVok7xirnR9jMWCd3wm55KqFMA8C2jJr+ YW6vpOBBOYP4v3WFO/TQ8PK7HwIpuEUJL06B6eiui06UlL4QWNb9yuhSjdr16DRMjECS Me3FcGe1ap+bvKbcrR/gt6HoQxRql9F0M9L+4jjyQxMtiBJdIFr+Ypv/sUijHlfNsrjt BrgJpaSPlB5Ygeh1O93XAk/2/tC8nKl9i8zvrTha6ADLd2nC1cqxgVP+gcAzuwIXwDJF f8MyVDlNW0TmPRDWIlixN6aSdwg3m03tgmUf/gBSE3ZQHGnhVQBI6VbGaTwBP1byWUem 3B/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYJAknhUIBDX6fEEqyTPXJKoQY0C/tZj2lF0l0W+DjJBbTwTn2 aY48+oCUbFtUX5oh/fyJVp8d08rm4Zl2XjIxKKLX5P/P9ikj+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4NQyYMvfIxSnr5EwOvWdnD3jtKNDRNhx0RvrbBxd0EJ+p6uKO0D0kFCX2jBlnu6e0bEdsZUQRInGJuJojZ1A=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb4d:: with SMTP id w13mr5888430pgj.397.1554782797839; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:06:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAdgstQuMOK2YjXEc9w3yEEQJSOMBXdE_Ln3eq7n-0s7g+uucw@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e421d05861114bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/ju5OdqzNvSIpgM1jmjhZDYgMHlI>
Subject: [6tisch] [Call for Review] draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 04:06:40 -0000

Dear all,

A new version of "draft-ietf-6tisch-msf" is just published at here:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-03.txt

This version mainly resolved the issues presented during IETF 104 meeting.
I would like to mention one of the main changes in this version is we
removed the frame pending bit feature.

It's for two reasons:
- it will influence the "adapt to traffic" strategy of MSF.
- the "adapt to traffic" strategy has the ability to handle burst traffic
by using a smaller MAX_NUMCELLS

Now we are calling for reviews on the new version of MSF!
Any comments and feedback are appreciated!

Tengfei



-- 
Chang Tengfei,
Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email