Re: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbucket - open issues
Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu> Wed, 04 February 2015 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <twatteyne@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5821A874A for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WemI9R6F0R0E for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3221A1A00A7 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l61so1211019wev.13 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:51:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lc32zRG8tPIvzGke6PfypKbSvbj/L6gTUt1PQQP4YyM=; b=vrUgiZJ2p1n8VOIhTFMfCPq/pLftlrR49K5D9YTIrGxmUER27Ycl/xGwQIRJqHp7Qs +jT2y5DxP/9wLHt4VlS/kgbN1pSj9H39ZjHU8iUQRnsWsMBbWTLjc+032qCadQ0546dn Oqsb2MF1CKi5DNEsLb34U/gXduNPNj1K8l+juOXpmZHLeMrMyXKXe704MzazUIBwT5oZ qlTU9Q/Nm5mpMLSu8Y0+A4LC7brAV3neZdCgw28pc7Es8K5jhZrivWwpLSZjGxYHahBs HeZZkaYmY2aBWIAo4nubSOApgbbKxE4hh9972YbHD2z9wvPImNjnjdIgZsuXHTW21vj3 Sf1A==
X-Received: by 10.180.21.162 with SMTP id w2mr44116484wie.42.1423050696746; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:51:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: twatteyne@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.82.39 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:51:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F085911F642A6847987ADA23E611780D1D0E43EA@hoshi.uni.lux>
References: <F085911F642A6847987ADA23E611780D1D0E43EA@hoshi.uni.lux>
From: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:51:16 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UTaubRWKmcr2fWmYrWrryLBpZlI
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-=G_AjvrWjPw9o9t25y8uTGJhrwD5iyk2OPgTF9cJ=CQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maria Rita PALATTELLA <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b87508047033c050e41cf12"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/kjz0tVRT03LznfOAAEZhWYjHCqk>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "Wang, Chonggang (Chonggang.Wang@interdigital.com)" <Chonggang.Wang@interdigital.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert) (pthubert@cisco.com)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "Rene Struik (rstruik.ext@gmail.com)" <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbucket - open issues
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:51:39 -0000
Maria Rita, Wonderful! I second your statement to use PDU as defined in RFC994. Thomas On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Maria Rita PALATTELLA < maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > based on the comments I kindly received from Rene and Chonggang, I have > updated the terminology draft. The new version is available on Bitbucket: > > https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-terminology/src/master/ > > > > Mainly I have fixed several definitions, trying to be more precise and > clearer, and I have also deleted some terms (security-related). > > There is *still one issue* related to the PDU acronym used for *the 6top > Data Convey Model* . *PDU* is well known to be *Protocol Data Unit > (RFC994)*. But in the 6top Data Convey Model, it is used for *Payload > Data Unit*. I would ask the 6top team to have a look, and see how we > could replace this acronym. Thanks! > > *@Rene/Chonggang, ALL* : *please, review the new version of the draft and > let me know if you would like still something to be changed.* > > Thank you! > > Best regards, > > Maria Rita > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbucket -… Maria Rita PALATTELLA
- Re: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbuck… Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbuck… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbuck… Wang, Chonggang