IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbucket - open issues

Maria Rita PALATTELLA <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu> Wed, 04 February 2015 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988D1A00C0 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMmGWG5xBncQ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hercules.uni.lu (hercules.uni.lu [158.64.76.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2DA1A00A7 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:46:37 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.09,518,1418079600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="57579797"
From: Maria Rita PALATTELLA <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>
To: "Rene Struik (rstruik.ext@gmail.com)" <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>, "Wang, Chonggang (Chonggang.Wang@interdigital.com)" <Chonggang.Wang@interdigital.com>, "Thomas Watteyne (watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu)" <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert) (pthubert@cisco.com)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: terminology - new version on bitbucket - open issues
Thread-Index: AdBAbqIDFuQQM7w0RoeZd6Dr7no44Q==
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:46:34 +0000
Message-ID: <F085911F642A6847987ADA23E611780D1D0E43EA@hoshi.uni.lux>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.91.0.143]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F085911F642A6847987ADA23E611780D1D0E43EAhoshiunilux_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/KBSGgDSjL6TALzFbyoLtq7qj_I4>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: [6tisch] terminology - new version on bitbucket - open issues
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:46:43 -0000

Dear all,

based on the comments I kindly received from Rene and Chonggang, I have updated the terminology draft. The new version is available on Bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-terminology/src/master/

Mainly I have fixed several definitions, trying to be more precise and clearer, and I have also deleted some terms (security-related).
There is still one issue related to the PDU acronym used for the 6top Data Convey Model . PDU is well known to be Protocol Data Unit (RFC994). But in the 6top Data Convey Model, it is used for Payload Data Unit. I would ask the 6top team to have a look, and see how we could replace this acronym. Thanks!
@Rene/Chonggang, ALL : please, review the new version of the draft and let me know if you would like still something to be changed.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Maria Rita

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email