[6tisch] charter 2.00

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 07 October 2015 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8051B2DF5 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DY49XUc99S09 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161421B2BC2 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6563; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444236436; x=1445446036; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Bbq3z5tzMYs7yh4dSWsBcPuWiewIcF1SZnUxENvvf9A=; b=fKjnYy0AZgXg8vFRnFoUiwRGbgT1HZsSW8N8PLM71+enAT6Eo5jWJtYj NnrXFqInww5dQMHGUWfHLMnN/ScIZjmkToHazrV6ptWEWFyLfoybyF5bV jJxUTczgozwdsVBy9pjCuNHuM3grF1Kj7X+O6m5lcFCjQBE6eAfMZ2AqO E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9BQCdSxVW/40NJK1egyeBSLZniD+GGoFDPBABAQEBAQEBfwuEKQQ6NgkSARokQhcPAQQKBA2IJsIkAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBHIZziR0FEApPhDUFhziOTQGGPoZRgV6EOZVmATgrhAKHFEOBBgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,650,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="33493208"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 16:47:15 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t97GlEEv027745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:47:15 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:47:14 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:47:14 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: charter 2.00
Thread-Index: AdEBFmNzNr1o6ffORDCrsLr2/MuCsw==
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:47:00 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:45:55 +0000
Message-ID: <a3eee1aa8eaa45c4a2b509597a28230a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.213.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/q4GNA9ppQ9XD7MTRCQ4JrJx0lvo>
Cc: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: [6tisch] charter 2.00
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 16:47:18 -0000

Dear all:

Please find below the result of our discussions on the new charter.
Our goal is to conclude the adoption of the text at the call on Friday
And ship it to the IESG. Fire at will!


"
6TiSCH: "IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e".

Background/Introduction:
------------------------

Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) interconnect a possibly large number 
of resource-constrained nodes to form a wireless mesh network. The 
6LoWPAN, ROLL and CoRE IETF Working Groups have defined protocols at 
various layers of the protocol stack, including an IPv6 adaptation 
layer, a routing protocol and a web transfer protocol. This protocol 
stack has been used with IEEE802.15.4 low-power radios.

The Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) mode was introduced in 2012 as an 
amendment to the Medium Access Control (MAC) portion of the IEEE802.15.4 
standard. TSCH is the emerging standard for industrial automation and 
process control LLNs, with a direct inheritance from WirelessHART and 
ISA100.11a. Defining IPv6 over TSCH, 6TiSCH is a key to enable the 
further adoption of IPv6 in industrial standards and the convergence of 
Operational Technology (OT) with Information Technology (IT).

The nodes in a IEEE802.15.4 TSCH network communicate by following a 
Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) schedule. A timeslot in this 
schedule provides a unit of bandwidth that is allocated for 
communication between neighbor nodes. The allocation can be programmed 
such that the predictable transmission pattern matches the traffic. This 
avoids idle listening, and extends battery lifetime for constrained 
nodes. Channel-hopping improves reliability in the presence of narrow-
band interference and multi-path fading.

These techniques enable a new range of use cases for LLNs, including:
- Control loops in a wireless process control network, in which high
reliability and a fully deterministic behavior are required.
- Service Provider networks transporting data from different independent
clients, and for which an operator needs flow isolation and traffic 
shaping.
- Networks comprising energy harvesting nodes, which require an 
extremely low and predictable average power consumption.

IEEE802.15.4 only defines the link-layer mechanisms. It does not define 
how the network communication schedule is built and matched to the 
traffic requirements of the network.

Description of Working Group:
-----------------------------

The Working Group will focus on enabling IPv6 over the TSCH mode of the
IEEE802.15.4 standard. The extent of the problem space for the WG is 
one or more LLNs, eventually federated through a common backbone link 
via one or more LLN Border Routers (LBRs). The WG will rely on, and if 
necessary extend, existing mechanisms for authenticating LBRs.

Initially, the WG has limited its scope to distributed routing over a 
static schedule using the Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL) on the resulting
network. This new charter allows for the dynamic allocation of cells and
their exchange between adjacent peers to accommodate the available bandwidth
to the variations of throughput in IP traffic. 

The WG will continue working on securing the join process and making that fit
within the constraints of high latency, low throughput and small frame sizes
that characterize IEEE802.15.4 TSCH.

Additionally, IEEE802.15.4 TSCH being a deterministic MAC, it is envisioned 
that 6TiSCH will benefit from the work of detnet WG to establish the so-called
deterministic tracks. The group will define the objects and methods that needs
to be configured, and provide the associated requirements to detnet.

The WG will interface with other appropriate groups in the IETF 
Internet, Operations and Management, Routing and Security areas.

Work Items:
-----------

The group will:

1. Produce "6TiSCH architecture" to describe the design of 6TiSCH 
networks. This document will highlight the different architectural 
blocks and signaling flows, including the operation of the network in 
the presence of multiple LBRs. The existing document will be augmented
to cover dynamic scheduling and application of the DetNet work.

2. Produce an Information Model containing the management requirements 
of a 6TiSCH node. This includes describing how an entity can manage the 
TSCH schedule on a 6TiSCH node, and query timeslot information from that 
node. MAC-layer interactions to negotiate Time Slots between peers will
be proposed, to be eventually continued at IEEE.

3. Produce an "On-the-fly" specification to enable a distributed dynamic
scheduling of time slots for IP traffic, with the capability for IoT routers
to appropriate chunks of the matrix without starving, or interfering with,
other 6TiSCH nodes.

4. Produce a specification for a secure 6TiSCH network bootstrap, adapted
to the constraints of 6TiSCH nodes and leveraging existing art when possible.

5. Produce requirements to the detnet WG, detailing the 6TiSCH tracks and the
data models to manipulate them from a central controller such as a PCE.


The work will include a best practice configuration for RPL and OF0 
operation over the static schedule. Based on that experience the group 
may produce a requirements draft for OF0 extensions, to be studied in ROLL.

Non-milestone work items:
-------------------------

The Working Group may maintain a number of running, often-respun 
documents, that evolve as the technology is refined for work items that 
do not affect the milestone work items:
- Interop sustaining guides: these document would carry such information as
packet captures and disambiguation of language from external standards to
help interop tests such as PlugTests and PlugFests.
- implementers guide: this document will collect clarifying information 
based on input from implementers, in particular as it becomes available 
from interoperability events. This guide will contain information about 
test harnesses used for interoperability testing.
- coexistence guide: this document will provide information on how 
6TiSCH can be operated in an environment shared with other protocols 
that use the same or a similar TSCH MAC, and/or operate on the same 
frequency band.

The WG will welcome requirements for dynamic timeslot operation, for 
example for centralized schedule computation.
"


Pascal