Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed resolution for issue 40 V3
Maria Rita PALATTELLA <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu> Tue, 05 January 2016 08:20 UTC
Return-Path: <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C45C1B2C5C for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:20:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.212
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H36V699oUgkZ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:20:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hercules.uni.lu (hercules.uni.lu [158.64.76.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693CC1B2C5B for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:20:39 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,524,1444687200"; d="scan'208";a="83501385"
From: Maria Rita PALATTELLA <maria-rita.palattella@uni.lu>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed resolution for issue 40 V3
Thread-Index: AQHRObCQEQViaEYDfECshixW/ObhGp7rq+mAgAEEBDA=
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:20:37 +0000
Message-ID: <F085911F642A6847987ADA23E611780D1D13AE6D@hoshi.uni.lux>
References: <2ef53fd8d663495fbc364d90fb91e92a@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <010D9A1F-A071-4B5D-AECB-E016C19F8329@gmail.com> <50c9010613014c628cd57a8ff3bc6c02@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50c9010613014c628cd57a8ff3bc6c02@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.34.0.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/uFh77czNSLGOs7CA1NRNTJj90tc>
Cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed resolution for issue 40 V3
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:20:43 -0000
Dear Pascal, Best wishes to you and all 6TiSCH folk for 2016! I support the new version of the abstract and Intro of the minimal draft. +1 Best Regards, Maria Rita -----Original Message----- From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert) Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 6:48 PM To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org> Cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed resolution for issue 40 V3 Dear all: With my best wishes for a great year 2016, please find a reminder that we have a consensus (last) call running on the abstract and introduction of the minimal draft. In order to cope with the Year-End break, the call continues till next Friday. So far, all I've been seeing is consensus with the latest change that Ralph proposed. Where we are at now is as below: -------------- Abstract BEFORE This document describes the minimal set of rules to operate an IEEE 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) network. This minimal mode of operation can be used during network bootstrap, as a fall- back mode of operation when no dynamic scheduling solution is available or functioning, or during early interoperability testing and development. --------------- AFTER This document describes a minimal mode of operation for a 6TiSCH Network, to provide IPv6 connectivity over a Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) mesh that is formed of IEEE 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) links. This minimal mode uses a collection of protocols including the 6LoWPAN framework and RPL to enable interoperable IPv6 connectivity over IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH with minimal network configuration and infrastructure. --------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Intro update: BEFORE -------------- 1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. 2. Introduction The nodes in a IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH network follow a communication schedule. The entity (centralized or decentralized) responsible for building and maintaining that schedule has precise control over the trade-off between the network's latency, bandwidth, reliability and power consumption. During early interoperability testing and development, however, simplicity is more important than efficiency. One goal of this document is to define the simplest set of rules for building a TSCH-compliant network, at the necessary price of lesser efficiency. Yet, this minimal mode of operation MAY also be used during network bootstrap before any schedule is installed into the network so nodes can self-organize and the management and configuration information be distributed. In addition, the minimal configuration MAY be used as a fall-back mode of operation, ensuring connectivity of nodes in case that dynamic scheduling mechanisms fail or are not available. The IEEE 802.15.4 specification provides a mechanism whereby the details of slotframe length, timeslot timing, and channel hopping pattern are communicated when a node time synchronizes to the network [IEEE802154]. This document describes specific settings for these parameters. --------------------------- AFTER -------------- 1. Introduction A 6TiSCH Network provides IPv6 connectivity over a Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) mesh that is formed of IEEE 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) links. The 6TiSCH [I-D.ietf-6tisch-architecture] architecture requires the use of both RPL and the 6LoWPAN adaptation layer framework ([RFC4944], [RFC6282]) as defined over IEEE 802.14.5. 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery [RFC6775] (ND) is also required to exchange Compression Contexts, form IPv6 addresses and register them for the purpose of Duplicate Address Detection, Address Resolution and Neighbor Unreachability detection over one TSCH link. Nodes in a IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH network follow a communication schedule. A network using the simple mode of operation uses a static schedule. This specification defines operational parameters and procedures for a minimal mode of operation to build a 6TiSCH Network. The 802.15.4 TSCH mode, the 6LoWPAN framework, RPL [RFC6550], and its Objective Function 0 (OF0) [RFC6552], are used unmodified, but parameters and particular operations of TSCH and RPL are specified to guarantee interoperability between nodes in a 6TiSCH Network. More advanced work is expected in the future to complement the Minimal Configuration with dynamic operations that can adapt the Schedule to the needs of the traffic in run time. 2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. Cheers, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms > Sent: vendredi 18 décembre 2015 17:24 > To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed resolution > for issue > 40 V3 > > (Moving discussion of the Abstract in "RE: [6tisch] #40 (minimal): > Ralph's INT AREA review on minimal" to this thread.) > > > > On Dec 18, 2015, at 9:13 AM 12/18/15, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > Dear all; > > > > In order to address Ralph's issues on the minimal draft, we proposed > > a > rewording of the abstract and the introduction. > > This reopens a 2-weeks period of last call for these particular > > sections, with > the text as below. > > If you disagree with the text, please let us know before January 1st. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Pascal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ralph Droms (rdroms) > > Sent: lundi 14 décembre 2015 19:35 > > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> > > Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: Summary of proposed resolution for issue 40 V3 > > > > > >> On Dec 14, 2015, at 11:16 AM 12/14/15, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Ralph: > >> > >> If you’re OK with this round, we’ll open a one week call to the WG > >> to check > consensus. > >> The proposed replacement for slotted aloha is subject to change > >> again in that phase J > >> > >> Please let us know; > > > > Assessing WG consensus is OK with me. > > > > - Ralph > > > >> > >> Pascal > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --- > >> ----------- > >> > >> Abstract update: > >> > >> BEFORE > >> > >> > >> -------------- > >> Abstract > >> > >> This document describes the minimal set of rules to operate an > >> IEEE > >> 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) network. This minimal > >> mode of operation can be used during network bootstrap, as a fall- > >> back mode of operation when no dynamic scheduling solution is > >> available or functioning, or during early interoperability testing > >> and development. > >> > >> --------------- > >> AFTER > >> > >> --------------- > >> Abstract > >> > >> This document describes a minimal mode of operation for a 6TiSCH > >> Network, to provide IPv6 connectivity over a Non-Broadcast > >> Multi-Access (NBMA) mesh that is formed of IEEE 802.15.4 > >> Timeslotted > Channel Hopping (TSCH) links. > >> This minimal mode uses a collection of protocols including the > >> 6LoWPAN framework and RPL to enable shared access operations over a > >> static TSCH schedule > > I'll reiterate my suggestion to use a higher level description here in the abstract: > > This minimal mode uses a collection of protocols including the 6LoWPAN > framework and RPL to enable interoperable IPv6 connectivity over IEEE > 802.15.4 TSCH with minimal network configuration and infrastructure. > > >> > >> ------------- > >> ------------- > >> ------------- > >> > >> Intro update: > >> > >> > >> > >> BEFORE > >> > >> > >> -------------- > >> > >> 1. Requirements Language > >> > >> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL > >> NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" > >> in > this > >> document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. > >> > >> 2. Introduction > >> > >> The nodes in a IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH network follow a communication > >> schedule. The entity (centralized or decentralized) responsible > >> for building and maintaining that schedule has precise control > >> over the trade-off between the network's latency, bandwidth, > >> reliability and power consumption. During early interoperability > >> testing and development, however, simplicity is more important than efficiency. > >> One goal of this document is to define the simplest set of rules > >> for building a TSCH-compliant network, at the necessary price of > >> lesser efficiency. Yet, this minimal mode of operation MAY also > >> be used during network bootstrap before any schedule is installed > >> into the network so nodes can self-organize and the management and > >> configuration information be distributed. In addition, the minimal > >> configuration MAY be used as a fall-back mode of operation, > >> ensuring connectivity of nodes in case that dynamic scheduling > >> mechanisms fail or are not available. The IEEE 802.15.4 > >> specification provides a mechanism whereby the details of > >> slotframe length, timeslot timing, and channel hopping pattern are > >> communicated when a node time synchronizes to the network > >> [IEEE802154]. This document describes specific settings for these parameters. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------- > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> AFTER > >> > >> -------------- > >> > >> > >> 1. Introduction > >> > >> A 6TiSCH Network provides IPv6 connectivity over a Non-Broadcast > >> Multi-Access (NBMA) mesh that is formed of IEEE 802.15.4 > >> Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) links. > >> > >> The 6TiSCH [I-D.ietf-6tisch-architecture] architecture requires > >> the use of both RPL and the 6LoWPAN adaptation layer framework > >> ([RFC4944], [RFC6282]) as defined over IEEE 802.14.5. > >> 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery [RFC6775] (ND) is also required to > >> exchange Compression Contexts, form IPv6 addresses and register > >> them for the purpose of Duplicate Address Detection, Address > >> Resolution and Neighbor Unreachability detection over one TSCH > >> link. > >> > >> Nodes in a IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH network follow a communication > >> schedule. A network using the simple mode of operation uses a > >> static schedule. > >> > >> This specification defines an operational parameters and > >> procedures > > s/an// > > >> for a minimal mode of operation to build a 6TiSCH Network, using > >> the Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL) and a static TSCH Schedule. > > Either delete ", using the Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL) and a > static TSCH Schedule" or mention all the other protocols in use here, as well. > > Do you want to mention the join process? Security? > > >> The 802.15.4 TSCH mode, the 6LoWPAN framework, RPL [RFC6550], and > >> its Objective Function 0 (OF0) [RFC6552], are used unmodified, but > >> parameters and particular operations of TSCH and RPL are specified > >> to guarantee interoperability between nodes in a 6TiSCH Network. > >> > >> More advanced work is expected in the future to complement the > >> Minimal Configuration with dynamic operations that can adapt the > >> Schedule to the needs of the traffic in run time. > >> > >> > >> 2. Requirements Language > >> > >> The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL > >> NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" > >> in > this > >> document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. > >> > >> Pascal > > > > <signature.asc>_______________________________________________ > > 6tisch mailing list > > 6tisch@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
- Re: [6tisch] FW: Consensus call on Summary of pro… pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- [6tisch] FW: Consensus call on Summary of propose… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of proposed re… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… Ralph Droms
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… S.V.R. Anand
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… Maria Rita PALATTELLA
- Re: [6tisch] Consensus call on Summary of propose… S.V.R.Anand
- Re: [6tisch] FW: Consensus call on Summary of pro… Xavier Vilajosana