Re: [72attendees] In-room network
Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Wed, 30 July 2008 10:19 UTC
Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424FA28C2F3; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C9628C2ED for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i+9xMdTYzj6W for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multicasttech.com (lennon.multicasttech.com [63.105.122.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395B628C2EC for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [63.105.122.7] (account marshall_eubanks HELO [IPv6:::1]) by multicasttech.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 12293060; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:19:37 -0400
Message-Id: <8DF29708-E0A4-4A5B-BB0E-CCE651A20658@multicasttech.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240602c4b5ed4c8723@[130.129.20.99]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:19:19 -0400
References: <OFDCEC6DCC.0AA7414F-ON85257496.002EAD53-85257496.002ED5CF@csc.com> <p06240602c4b5ed4c8723@[130.129.20.99]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926)
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] In-room network
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
My 25XX room network was fine, both after the social last night, and this morning. Regards Marshall On Jul 30, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Randall Gellens wrote: > At 4:31 AM -0400 7/30/08, Janet P Gunn wrote: > >> According to the front desk last night (after I came out to the >> lobby since I was having the same problem in the room) they were >> having problems with the whole hotel network, and were working on it. > > This morning, the front desk had no idea about any network problems, > and offered only to send a maintenance person to my room (to unclog > the network with a toilet plunger, perhaps?) > > -- > Randall Gellens > Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself > only > -------------- Randomly-selected tag: --------------- > Substitute "damn" every time you're inclined to write "very"; your > editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be. > --Mark Twain > _______________________________________________ > 72attendees mailing list > 72attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees _______________________________________________ 72attendees mailing list 72attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
- [72attendees] In-room network Ben Campbell
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Claudia Galvan
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Arnoud van Wijk
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Jari Arkko
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Dale Worley
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Ben Campbell
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Abhijit Choudhury (achoudhu)
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Vint Cerf
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Tony Hansen
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Vint Cerf
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Vint Cerf
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Richard Pruss
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network LANGE Andrew
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Ted Lemon
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Jihoon Lee
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Janet P Gunn
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Marc Blanchet
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Randall Gellens
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Tony Hansen
- Re: [72attendees] In-room network Thomas Walsh