Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 06:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF64C21F862F for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.556, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xj9x2h3rDkJm for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E213821F8541 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 23:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-CheckPoint: {4E40DC2A-1-1B221DC2-FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7967jGv003656; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:07:45 +0300
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:07:45 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Dae Young KIM <dykim6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:07:43 +0300
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
Thread-Index: AcxWWqf2rFsTUYBdQp+qjVqqQXfy4Q==
Message-ID: <CA66A8CD.4F80%ynir@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF246870-1C50-4FDA-B666-2D81867CD932@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 06:07:22 -0000
On 8/9/11 8:39 AM, "Dae Young KIM" <dykim6@gmail.com> wrote: >One brutal practice taken in some other conferences are to shut off >wireless in meeting rooms. As long as there's networks available in the >room, you cannot contol the situation. Which would have worked four years ago, but not so much today. Besides, Internet engineering without the Internet? >And as I observed, there were more often than not also a whole bunch of >'renowned' IETFers imnersed into their screens, even sometimes >programming. > >Are they also IETF Tourists according to your classification? Definitely > >DY from my iPhone Your iPhone (and iPads, and many laptops today) would have an Internet connection even if the IETF shut down the wifi.