IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3DD21F8B0E for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.154
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.154 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.295, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iby1cf0r0ocn for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail5.alcatel.fr (smail5.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213F221F8AEA for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id p79ApGev002424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 12:51:17 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.45]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 12:51:16 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:51:13 +0200
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
Thread-Index: AcxWVrqkK9YltNs/QCeLqsYtP/uL9AAK2Ifw
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE2208035C1@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D213914A1EBA927@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsso n.se> <CAFgODJfSOHdt-Lzz6bpnHSCSi5kLMu3Yjjh2xU5b35Dtwm5tRw@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076127BF@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <CAFgODJecoePK7RX=+4DpwZ93qKE1HvjBq7vPOEkToxy0LfnOXg@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB07612885@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera. com> <FF871B758C55949D49F19663@PST.JCK.COM> <p0624061aca6632f15733@loud.pensive.org> <6D2E50D9-65FC-49D6-89C7-2FB3BF316F78@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D2E50D9-65FC-49D6-89C7-2FB3BF316F78@checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.13
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:51:04 -0000

Unfortunately, the success of the IETF is not measured by the number of RFCs published, and therefore this entire charging model doesn't work.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Yoav Nir
> Sent: 09 August 2011 06:40
> To: Randall Gellens
> Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting
> complacent? Good job!)
> 
> 
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:56 AM, Randall Gellens wrote:
> 
> >
> > 	- Meetings in Hawaii and other desirable locales
> > 	- A lower "basic entry" registration fee which gets one in to the
> > reception, social, and plenary
> > 	- A higher "hard core" registration fee allowing unlimited entry
> > to all WGs and BOFs
> > 	- A "premier facilitator" discount for companies registering 10,
> > 20, 30 attendees
> > 	- A "valiant contributor" discount on an individual registration
> > fees based on number of RFCs published as author, editor,
> > contributor, or acknowledgement
> 
> I think a $50 discount per RFC is reasonable. Although we'd end up paying
> people like Hannes and Bernard Aboba $2000 to attend.
> 
> > 	- Press releases for each meeting with names of companies paying
> > for people to attend, (in order of how much they paid total)
> > congratulating them for helping progress the future of the Internet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email