IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CB511E8097 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.409
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42q-y6WXY+z4 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (173-162-214-217-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.162.214.217]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7C711E807C for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (unknown [64.215.212.152]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8C5523802EA for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:41:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E70DBE18-A799-4B7F-8181-3FE510D67920"
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:41:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net>
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net>
Message-Id: <D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:41:03 -0000

On Aug 3, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> (Just to be thorough -- the concerns that I saw raised that seemed to have a base of agreement were:  Delta's network, a tendency for very cold meeting rooms, and high food prices. I also heard some complaints about food at the Hilton, but not on the list.  Were there others?)

Of course, very cold meeting rooms seem to be a pretty common theme.   This is not the first IETF where my teeth have been chattering as I tried to speak into the mic.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email