Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9D5E8008 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.675, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LR0I6BiHrczG for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26455E8001 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; l=1231; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312835530; x=1314045130; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=QU3ROB6xiqiudsg1rXzmmHV6p94je3qlj2YT8hglJj8=; b=IT743iGzRfnas8x4RNDtSPiGkVZ50x3/gXzIWpRJcQorCaIRhXoJ+8lv HzvDuskaGBbmkyN0yBEORArPOGwSlqefZ37KDgeTP0sXWlUzMwT2mABKg 9V6RSj9zN6dGsQ/IoCJA1Rfim0zXNKogsuyvamQyiTvmZlv2hciMkVs4P A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqsNAOhGQE6rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABDpxsNd4FAAQEBAQIBEgECASQ/BQsLGC5XBjWHS59oAYMcDwGbRYZHBIdcnC4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,339,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="10975007"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2011 20:32:10 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com (sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com [10.21.145.250]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p78KW9gZ023788; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:32:09 GMT
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:32:09 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0624060dca65d7d9da9c@loud.pensive.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108081327170.21430@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu siness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p0624060dca65d7d9da9c@loud.pensive.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:31:44 -0000

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Randall Gellens wrote:

> At 8:32 AM -0700 8/8/11, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> 
> Of course.  No one could expect the IAOC to optimize for everything or
> everyone.
> 
> But, two points:
> 
> - In general, locations with greater air service diversity will be better for
> more people than those without.

And Kansai has plenty of service diversity last I checked, even if it 
may not be as great as Narita. The recommended option was to use 
Kansai, but it was certainly possible to take the train from Tokyo 
too (and those details were carefully outlined). The whole point here 
is that FLYING from Narita to Hiroshima is sub-optimal in many ways,
yet a bunch of people chose to do so.

> 
> - It's not fair to say "Anyone who found it problematic or inconvenient to get
> to x was just too lazy or stupid to follow the advice/instructions."
> (Especially when the advice dictates which airline to choose.)

I hope I didn't say that, but I dealt with plenty of people who had 
strong travel preferences that made things more painful. I am 
certainly NOT talking about choice of airline here, I wouldn't give
up an upgrade either in your situation.

Ole

> 
> -- 
> Randall Gellens