IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE65C21F880C for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.737, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KtCb8A4R9xjS for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FA121F84F7 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:52:47 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:52:46 -0700
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AcxSJhd1RByrw1j7Qrabh0bMd784bwAM9QMA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF56F@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF56FEXCHC2corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:52:34 -0000

Every working group will be issued a set of hoodies in the future.  Sorted.

From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:41 PM
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

On Aug 3, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
(Just to be thorough -- the concerns that I saw raised that seemed to have a base of agreement were:  Delta's network, a tendency for very cold meeting rooms, and high food prices. I also heard some complaints about food at the Hilton, but not on the list.  Were there others?)


Of course, very cold meeting rooms seem to be a pretty common theme.   This is not the first IETF where my teeth have been chattering as I tried to speak into the mic.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email