IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Cui Yang <cuiyang@huawei.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cuiyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F2211E80B0 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.305, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NX4ML9mlS1V4 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0238621F8588 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPD002Z5PF2SL@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for 81attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:59:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPD00HNRPF2XP@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for 81attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:59:26 +0800 (CST)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ACW76297; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:59:25 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.93) by szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:59:20 +0800
Received: from SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.224]) by szxeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.93]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:59:23 +0800
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:59:21 +0000
From: Cui Yang <cuiyang@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A873C1AC@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.108.64.159]
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Message-id: <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE21606C5E09E@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-CN
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Thread-topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-index: AQHMTy0ag6ib+lDUoEOA6K9vzZQujpUG10qs//+o64CAAAcDgIAAcpyAgAENoICAAAaKgIAACPkAgAACHICAA8o5kA==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4D3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <35029755-4F66-4ACD-A76B-3EE47D5ABFD7@cisco.com> <A9866519-006F-4A41-A94B-C3CC05971934@thomasclausen.org> <BC868E5A-54A9-4EBD-A95B-527E22421A87@cisco.com> <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A873C1AC@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:59:14 -0000

Support! I was once in a crypto conference with a Beach-Barbecue in Santa Barbara.
That is a splendid experience.
But be sure to take your coat, it's cold at night even in August :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tina TSOU
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:00 AM
To: Fred Baker; Thomas Heide Clausen
Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Fully support. I'm sure the work will be progressed more smoothly in the beach. 
It is also convenient for people going from northern California where all these companies are located to southern California.


Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html


-----Original Message-----
From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 3:53 PM
To: Thomas Heide Clausen
Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!


On Aug 1, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

> ps:  Having an IETF in Santa Barbara would actually be a splendid idea: even though I likely would have two or three connections, I can quite easily imagine quite enjoying a beach-BOF or two....

:-)
_______________________________________________
81attendees mailing list
81attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
_______________________________________________
81attendees mailing list
81attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email