IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3717321F86CA for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.749, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bfWLzgVKzPjM for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE8A21F86C7 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 20:24:10 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>, "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:24:08 -0700
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AQHMTy0atj57J3tPW0G2CXFxSCDC/ZUG10zrgAAeQoCAAAcDgIAAcpyAgAAW/wCABIZDQA==
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF56D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4D3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <9874B48E-1D92-4BAA-9BBD-F6FB4EAB5374@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9874B48E-1D92-4BAA-9BBD-F6FB4EAB5374@nominet.org.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF56DEXCHC2corpclo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:23:57 -0000

Hubs that feed the major Canadian airports that are not in the US might also have such restrictions.

How about we just gradually disqualify all possible venues and hold future meetings via jabber only just so everyone can avoid all possible inconveniences and restrictions?  Oh crap, I forgot time zones!

Sheesh.

From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ray Bellis
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:14 AM
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!


However for many people two of those four require getting a transit VISA for the US, in addition to any VISA required to enter Canada...

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email