IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)

Curtis Villamizar <cvillamizar@infinera.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <cvillamizar@infinera.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848B021F8B8F for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dOYj96lryaAh for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com (sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com [8.4.225.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2E721F8B78 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com ([fe80::dc68:4e20:6002:a8f9]) by sv-casht-prod1.infinera.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:22:57 -0700
From: Curtis Villamizar <cvillamizar@infinera.com>
To: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
Thread-Index: AQHMVg3cjwHZ9wElskK/wD+VFvUV5pUTdnyQ
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:22:55 +0000
Message-ID: <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076128B0@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D213914A1EBA927@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <CAFgODJfSOHdt-Lzz6bpnHSCSi5kLMu3Yjjh2xU5b35Dtwm5tRw@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076127BF@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <CAFgODJecoePK7RX=+4DpwZ93qKE1HvjBq7vPOEkToxy0LfnOXg@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB07612885@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <1DA942E7-8A3A-43AD-B687-8E75E125E50B@daedelus.com>
In-Reply-To: <1DA942E7-8A3A-43AD-B687-8E75E125E50B@daedelus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.100.99.21]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076128B0SVEXDBPROD1infi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>, Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.ac.kr>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:22:30 -0000

OK.  I stand corrected.

From: Jim Martin [mailto:jim@daedelus.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:58 PM
To: Curtis Villamizar
Cc: Dae Young KIM; 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)


On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:


I heard from one of the volunteers that sets up the venue that the host was uncooperative with regard to configuring the network, requiring the staff to discover the topology due to failure to communicate as equipment was deployed and having to configure unfamiliar equipment with the host providing equipment but little or no assistance in the equipment configuration.


          This was not the case. We worked closely with the folks from Tsinghua, both in the configuration and the deployment.  Ultimately, it was their network, and it came off quite well. They deserve kudos, not darts, for their efforts.

          - Jim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email