IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACFC21F8D06 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.665, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCICOq-P3a4H for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467F21F8D01 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22212 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2011 15:06:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=56c3.4e36c10a.k1108; bh=oQInnwh9G5GwXVy0EhGcVRb7qYZjxYCROQqfiDhDvEE=; b=KZKeC1QCXi/1ViusvvYwNNoTQn7N3UTes1XsAmRHtPzVB2zbnHn/hi4L+dbzQAdmpUWWVbtD0s4M6fylEoUknT21Wixo+bqDXn+yBbbHuX+gk4sycYTpk6vXcToiFVjU7o48EmdNhAMl6d8z5acanKjnFq2PYX5YBXg4oC460Vo=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Aug 2011 15:06:27 -0000
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:06:49 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011106280.3518@joyce.lan>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:06:45 -0000

> A city with a real set of international connections is better (eg Vancouver)

Quebec is within driving distance of about 1/4 of the population in North
America.  Vancouver isn't.

R's,
John

PS: The food's a lot better, too.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email