IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)

Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@daedelus.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9EE11E80AF for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.954
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.954 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.746, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBdQD3nQXhT7 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBB511E80AD for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imladris.daedelus.com (imladris.daedelus.com [206.197.161.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B58088187; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:64:225:4bff:fed5:a7ac] (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:64:225:4bff:fed5:a7ac]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imladris.daedelus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B8113083BA; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-16--477569114"
From: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>
In-Reply-To: <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB07612885@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:57:59 -0700
Message-Id: <1DA942E7-8A3A-43AD-B687-8E75E125E50B@daedelus.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D213914A1EBA927@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <CAFgODJfSOHdt-Lzz6bpnHSCSi5kLMu3Yjjh2xU5b35Dtwm5tRw@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076127BF@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <CAFgODJecoePK7RX=+4DpwZ93qKE1HvjBq7vPOEkToxy0LfnOXg@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB07612885@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
To: Curtis Villamizar <cvillamizar@infinera.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>, Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.ac.kr>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:57:38 -0000

On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

> I heard from one of the volunteers that sets up the venue that the host was uncooperative with regard to configuring the network, requiring the staff to discover the topology due to failure to communicate as equipment was deployed and having to configure unfamiliar equipment with the host providing equipment but little or no assistance in the equipment configuration.
> 

	This was not the case. We worked closely with the folks from Tsinghua, both in the configuration and the deployment.  Ultimately, it was their network, and it came off quite well. They deserve kudos, not darts, for their efforts. 

	- Jim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email