Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

["Carlos M. Martinez" <[e-mail]>]

Quebec was great for the event itself (venue, hotels, food, sightseeing)
and flights were definitely good enough. I'd be happy to attend another
conference in Quebec City.

As someone mentioned some emails ago, if the greatest complaints are an
extra (30 minutes long) plane ride and air a bit cold on some rooms,
then I believe the local hosts can be very proud of having held a great
event.

Carlos

On 8/3/11 3:53 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> I was actually referring to the really MAJOR hubs:
>
> Chicago, Tokyo, Frankfurt, Paris, London, New York, Oslo [:-)] and so 
> on.
>
> Generalizations aside, another tradeoff is the range of hotels in a 
> given location. Cities like Paris, Tokyo and London have good 
> transportation options and everything from luxury hotels to "stay
> with a family". It's not really possible to optimize for all the 
> desirable features of our locations, but our starting point is a 
> suitable meeting venue which everyone seems to agree QC had.
>
> Ole
>
>
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: [phone]   Mobile: [phone]
> E-mail: [e-mail]  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> Skype: organdemo
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Adam Roach wrote:
>
>> On 8/3/11 1:26 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>>> * Hubs (assuming we agree on the definition) tend to be in expensive
>>>    locations
>> I'm not so certain about that generalization. Major US hubs include Dallas,
>> Houston and Atlanta -- which are, generally speaking, rather inexpensive
>> compared to most off-the-beaten-path places we've gone resently.
>>
>> /a
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

-- 
Carlos M. Martinez
LACNIC I+D
PGP KeyID 0xD51507A2
Phone: [phone] ext. 4419