Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 21:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3169E11E80AD for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.409
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h57vvJJBq+vp for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (173-162-214-217-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.162.214.217]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFE911E8097 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (unknown [64.215.212.152]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A8CB23802EA for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:47:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BEEDA2C4-20AD-420C-B01A-DCED60A534A0"
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:47:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com>
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:47:34 -0000

On Aug 3, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> Hiroshima had a similar record, both in the "but darn it there was a final leg to the trip" and "everything else was wonderful".

I don't mean to criticize excessively, but the complaints about how hard Hiroshima was to get to pretty much blew my mind.   It was not only easy, but pleasant.   The people who had trouble were the ones who refused to use ground transportation, even though ground transportation in Japan is much better than air transport.   Traveling to IETF requires a bit of advance planning.   If you do the homework, which mostly involves asking people who know the area what to do, you get there, and it's not a problem.   If you don't, you have a difficult time.

This is a small problem, and few people complain about it.   I would complain pretty loudly if I had to go to Dallas for every IETF—there's no food, and you have to rent a car, because there is no public transport, and the hotels are all out in the middle of nowhere.   You'd be trading an extra hour or three of travel on either end for daily hassles.   In QC, there was a vegetarian cafeteria two blocks from the hotel, and tons of good restaurants, so you could just stay in the hotel and be done with it.