IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"Montgomery, Douglas" <dougm@nist.gov> Thu, 04 August 2011 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dougm@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AB221F8582 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.471, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HPPqOZAZCKpy for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wsget1.nist.gov (wsget1.nist.gov [129.6.13.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAE821F8581 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 14:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov (129.6.18.96) by wsget1.nist.gov (129.6.13.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.0; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:34:03 -0400
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB1.xchange.nist.gov ([129.6.18.96]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:34:28 -0400
From: "Montgomery, Douglas" <dougm@nist.gov>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Sebastian Castro <sebastian@nzrs.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:34:26 -0400
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AcxS7jW5+FFPnpewSiWFGsz1/YqUlg==
Message-ID: <CA608829.5C9D9%dougm@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <4E3B0A84.4030609@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:34:20 -0000

On 8/4/11 5:09 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>
>We could rotate between Iceland and Hawaii (each is between two major
>continents), or add Mauritius for a third location. :)

Can we get volcano insurance as part of the standard hotel/air
arrangements?
Dougm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email