IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43A921F8801 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.458, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nqpu0CzwhWHt for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (173-162-214-217-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.162.214.217]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDEE21F8753 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kali.fugue.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1486:226:bbff:fe0c:e5bf]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A494123800F8; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 00:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6C014E0-BDE5-4D1A-989A-AED4AF5BDCDD"
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:42:36 -0400
Message-Id: <D581C7FB-D362-4C1C-8E1F-7CC83C48B09C@fugue.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu siness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:42:17 -0000

On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> Lots of complaints resulted from long layovers at Narita for the one 
> daily flight from there, transfers to Haneda for domestic flights, or 
> even required overnight hotel stays, when all of that could have been 
> (mostly) avoided.

I needed the day for jet lag, so eliminating the overnight in Tokyo seemed like an unnecessary optimization.   But I'm probably not at the center of the bell curve: I simply can't imagine why anybody would pass up the chance to stay a night in Tokyo.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email