IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca> Mon, 01 August 2011 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0E21F8B7B for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sawmJA8IIde5 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.157]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084121F8B02 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP35 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:02:38 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [67.70.129.154]
X-Originating-Email: [coverdale@sympatico.ca]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP35E2581DD81DD01B8CD1F5D0380@phx.gbl>
Received: from PaulNewPC ([67.70.129.154]) by BLU0-SMTP35.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:02:36 -0700
From: Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011106280.3518@joyce.lan> <67CD028F-3C38-4036-B130-EBD47B6F2AAE@isi.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011122330.3518@joyce.lan> <4E36D701.50704@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4E36D701.50704@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:02:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcxQadYPqmetxCN9Rua5Aove/8oZPgACtapw
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2011 18:02:36.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[320E3790:01CC5075]
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:02:32 -0000

Don't know why everybody's complaining about the difficulty in getting to
Quebec City. Samuel de Champlain managed it in 1608, and I bet there were
even fewer direct flights than there are now, and not so many highways
either.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
>On Behalf Of Joe Touch
>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:41 PM
>To: John R. Levine
>Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
>Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
>
>
>
>On 8/1/2011 8:41 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
>>>> Quebec is within driving distance of about 1/4 of the population in
>>>> North
>>>> America. Vancouver isn't.
>
>NA = 530M
>
>Canada - Quebec province = 26M
>Eastern US states within dist = (all in millions)
>	CT = 3.5
>	ME = 1.3
>	MA = 6.4
>	NH = 1.3
>	NY = 19
>	RI = 1
>	VT = 0.6
>
>	Some major cities out of dist:
>		NYC (8hrs) = 8
>		Boston (6 hrs) = 4
>
>	i.e., 21.1M possibly within dist
>
>That's a total of 47.1M out of 530M
>
>Not even 10%, and that includes a LOT of places nobody would ever drive
>from.
>
>Agreed that Vancouver is even less useful for driving (under 7M), but
>how many attendees drove (not just from nearby airports)?
>
>Joe
>
>_______________________________________________
>81attendees mailing list
>81attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email