IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674FC11E8139 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xs3Ei3sWbXgX for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213A311E811E for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.106.104.211] ([108.60.46.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id p71HRIfA003227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:27:23 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2r555f3rk.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:27:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2553D193-4059-4AA1-9E2A-53CABF1FBCFF@doubleshotsecurity.com>
References: <4E36D701.50704@isi.edu> <CA5C45CF.12C83%bschlies@cisco.com> <m2r555f3rk.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:27:21 -0000

On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> If this is how we're going to think about it, then...
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_center_of_the_United_States
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_midpoint_of_Europe
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Asia
> 
> http://www.fremontseattle.com/centeroftheuniverse.html

LOL - since I lived there (and now only a mile away) I will attest to Fremont in Seattle being the center of the universe :)   And please don't anyone shatter my illusion!

And since I'm already typing...great job on venue and organization.  I think Quebec was a place that easily combined constructive work collaboration and plenty of outside activities to de-compress for a few hours when needed.

- merike

> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email