IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D5721F86D8 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.591, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_INXPNS=2.3, PLING_QUERY=1.39, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJqpnkcmnvTc for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34C21F8906 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-110.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p73IU6lG044478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:30:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4E3993AE.7000508@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:30:06 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108031118470.2965@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108031118470.2965@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:30:03 -0000

On 8/3/11 1:26 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> * Hubs (assuming we agree on the definition) tend to be in expensive
>    locations

I'm not so certain about that generalization. Major US hubs include 
Dallas, Houston and Atlanta -- which are, generally speaking, rather 
inexpensive compared to most off-the-beaten-path places we've gone resently.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email