IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jbradley@mac.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D5C5E8002 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.695, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0-TpMA10sZy for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtpout019.mac.com (asmtpout019.mac.com [17.148.16.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F67321F8802 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 13:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from [192.168.1.211] ([190.22.14.181]) by asmtp019.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LPF00ML66JPBS90@asmtp019.mac.com> for 81attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-08-04_05:2011-08-04, 2011-08-04, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1108040201
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3AF64B5C-AA98-4A2B-98FC-522BA8A54057"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com>
In-reply-to: <20110804185940.GI38760@shinkuro.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:07:13 -0400
Message-id: <901E24B8-3B0B-4D35-930D-EEBC96687B5F@mac.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF56E@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4E3AB6CC.2030606@dcrocker.net> <CAHBDyN5nvd-Z4AiTHxhMc3VuGkQA+oQ23XVYTM_aXKDLJ=bZmw@mail.gmail.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C2E114B95D@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110804185940.GI38760@shinkuro.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:07:09 -0000

Having moved from Canada to Chile, I feel compelled to point out the wonderful facilities and direct flights from Europe and North America and Aukland.

We do however have a reciprocity fee for Americans, but the American Gov could fix that if they wanted:)

John Bradley


On 2011-08-04, at 2:59 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 12:21:15PM -0400, Ross Callon wrote:
> 
>> think that Vancouver has worked out well more than once and I
>> suspect that we might want one or two east coast North America
>> locations (perhaps one in Canada and one in the US).
> 
> I think this is an excellent idea.  Both Halifax, NS and St John's, NL
> would be interesting places to go, are large enough to have the
> facilities, and would ensure that we had a lot of discussion about how
> hard it is to get to places in Canada.  In St John's case, however,
> we'd have the advantage that it would be equally difficult for almost
> everyone.
> 
> (ObSmiley redacted)
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email