Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00B321F87FA for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <v5T-GwS+tVqN>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5T-GwS+tVqN for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BA021F8777 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=rg+ietf@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1312768480; x=1344304480; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:date:to:from: subject:cc:content-type:x-random-sig-tag; z=Message-Id:=20<p06240617ca64efc7b47b@loud.pensive.org> |In-Reply-To:=20<m24o1s8zqn.wl%randy@psg.com>|References: =20<4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com>=0D=0A=20<A5B9F059BE69461F80 08EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com>=0D=0A=20<80A0822C5E9A444 0A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>=0D=0A =20<3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> =0D=0A=20<m24o1s8zqn.wl%randy@psg.com>|X-Mailer:=20Eudora =20for=20Mac=20OS=20X|Date:=20Sun,=207=20Aug=202011=2018: 46:22=20-0700|To:=20Randy=20Bush=20<randy@psg.com>|From: =20Randall=20Gellens=20<rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>|Subject:=20 Re:=20[81attendees]=20are=20we=20getting=20complacent?=20 Good=20job!|Cc:=20Ted=20Lemon=20<mellon@fugue.com>,=20<81 attendees@ietf.org>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20chars et=3D"us-ascii"=20=3B=20format=3D"flowed" |X-Random-Sig-Tag:=201.0b28; bh=jjHl+//eIKBk7WKNdLrbJgOIakZ+1O8YOM3QlygITAQ=; b=ibqITbQqNi/Ls6uLR7vjfmW9nK8GlgZcgrSHORrNpt5wA3q5FOHeeeS8 sWkbUhJ1IVTQSVpC7on13HTqtKXG/e2yugslZrqJHotMG751zP7KEjrMA VFROEmzSEmquo/8LE8yafogkagbxtqfVc6Pk76lsMPoD094Uxlpef2Pe7 Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6431"; a="108695381"
Received: from ironmsg03-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2011 18:54:40 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,333,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="59451472"
Received: from warlock.qualcomm.com ([129.46.50.49]) by Ironmsg03-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Aug 2011 18:54:40 -0700
Received: from loud.pensive.org (myvpn-r-710.ras.qualcomm.com [10.64.2.198]) by warlock.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id p781sanU028747; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:39 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240617ca64efc7b47b@loud.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <m24o1s8zqn.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <m24o1s8zqn.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:46:22 -0700
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:54:16 -0000

At 10:21 AM +0900 8/8/11, Randy Bush wrote:

>   > I did a lot of research, but to avoid an overnight in NRT/TKO had to
>>  take a once-a-day domestic connection, then a taxi, then a train, then
>>  another taxi.
>
>  the way to avoid an overnight in nrt is to not fly there.

I said that I could have done that, but it would have forced a 
different carrier and hence a downgrade.

>  as ted said:
>
>>>  Traveling to IETF requires a bit of advance planning.  If you do the
>>>  homework, which mostly involves asking people who know the area what
>>>  to do, you get there, and it's not a problem.  If you don't, you have
>>>  a difficult time.

As I said, I did oodles of research.  One could argue about the 
merits of such research versus, say, reading or writing drafts, but 
that's a different point.  The assertion that only people who failed 
to do research experienced problems is silly.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
But, something that only exists in thought is even better, as
you can read for yourself in my favorite book of (English)
verse and drawings, "The Space-Child's Mother Goose" (Verses
by Frederick Winsor, Illustrations by Marian Parry, Simon and
Schuster, 1958, unfortunately out of print):
    I have a pet hen whose name is Probable. She lays eggs in
    concept, being a sophist bird.  But not in reality at all;
    those would be inferior eggs; for thought is superior to
    reality.
--unknown