Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53B421F8CA5 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCcRs2RlWJT0 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E531221F8B6A for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=273; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312239174; x=1313448774; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lx6KQOkNbFb5lQoxs45LmM2sc4qGovWj01p8PQL+Yg8=; b=gJZ7Cz7HnJIg9q8T1NlehGCd1/z3HOOy5kUqTNtyE6AnIT3Rhj8fZK7O /j0jneBrkgMnZ1CLcltHaqV9mMk/XFcGDfZQCZ1mR/gTH914CdMcIRa1x VlOh17tszKWm249tWD5jG7daQ2/0g7mIkrwvWZsOB0zf27hYA9UmDRgs8 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggQAIUtN06rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCp1MNd4FAAQEBAQIBEgFmBQsLRlcGNYdKogEBnnaFY18Eh1qLIYUHi30
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,303,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="8601585"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2011 22:52:54 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p71Mqqwt018612; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 22:52:52 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:52:53 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com on Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:52:53 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A9866519-006F-4A41-A94B-C3CC05971934@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:52:40 -0700
Message-Id: <BC868E5A-54A9-4EBD-A95B-527E22421A87@cisco.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4D3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <35029755-4F66-4ACD-A76B-3EE47D5ABFD7@cisco.com> <A9866519-006F-4A41-A94B-C3CC05971934@thomasclausen.org>
To: Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:52:52 -0000

On Aug 1, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

> ps:  Having an IETF in Santa Barbara would actually be a splendid idea: even though I likely would have two or three connections, I can quite easily imagine quite enjoying a beach-BOF or two….

:-)