IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> Sun, 07 August 2011 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2B321F86BD for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <6qe+Se1Kmy-P>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qe+Se1Kmy-P for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD0C21F863C for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=rg+ietf@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1312759918; x=1344295918; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:date:to:from: subject:content-type:x-random-sig-tag; z=Message-Id:=20<p06240610ca64d0204983@loud.pensive.org> |In-Reply-To:=20<D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fug ue.com>|References:=20<4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com>=0D=0A=20 <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com>=0D=0A =20<80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.n sn-intra.net>=0D=0A=20<3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26 D9@softarmor.com>=0D=0A=20<alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420. 20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu=0D=0A=20siness.ne t>=09<4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net>=0D=0A=20<D9101D12-46 02-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>|X-Mailer:=20Eudora =20for=20Mac=20OS=20X|Date:=20Sun,=207=20Aug=202011=2016: 31:07=20-0700|To:=20Ted=20Lemon=20<mellon@fugue.com>,=20< 81attendees@ietf.org>|From:=20Randall=20Gellens=20<rg+iet f@qualcomm.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20[81attendees]=20are=20we =20getting=20complacent?=20Good=20job!|Content-Type:=20te xt/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii"=20=3B=20format=3D"flow ed"|X-Random-Sig-Tag:=201.0b28; bh=kR4oyXJkLxXUBuS6eJErjk7fuQki8l0JsvDKIId/Txo=; b=GvKlpv3c9bKCZK9df40qP4QbLS9zjWo34hqtm0k5TllGxXhKnbFCpjWg MKliYIQkQR8FtJ7hxTAUVcI/vz/pj49vz7DQPEJcTKncOeFlAaLCI9pYq TZ2rBXhqFdlbtrh7CbntQgswPv2+OMspfvsNKrMZQbt6HmOTiYvI4OzfP I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6431"; a="108684813"
Received: from ironmsg03-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2011 16:31:51 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,333,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="59416289"
Received: from warlock.qualcomm.com ([129.46.50.49]) by Ironmsg03-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Aug 2011 16:31:51 -0700
Received: from loud.pensive.org (myvpn-r-710.ras.qualcomm.com [10.64.2.198]) by warlock.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id p77NVmLU009447; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 16:31:50 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240610ca64d0204983@loud.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu siness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <D9101D12-4602-417E-9383-C50EB10E42F0@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:31:07 -0700
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, 81attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:31:35 -0000

At 5:41 PM -0400 8/3/11, Ted Lemon wrote:

>  Of course, very cold meeting rooms seem to be a pretty common 
> theme.   This is not the first IETF where my teeth have been 
> chattering as I tried to speak into the mic.

Yeah, the problem, I think, is that most conference facilities are 
set up for hordes of suit-wearers.  Another reason to consider 
open-air facilities in tropical venues (Hawaii was discussed not too 
long ago).  Plus, we can pack lighter, lessening our carbon footprint.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Power corrupts; Powerpoint corrupts absolutely.
            --Vint Cert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email