IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Benson Schliesser <bschlies@cisco.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bschlies@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333F11E8139 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.110, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ntOkddu6CMzs for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E56911E812C for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=bschlies@cisco.com; l=715; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312219316; x=1313428916; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9pj18fs+sDkbyb0Lhe8qNjByvjx8EIJQZUhiJGvEt34=; b=JLf6PmeD9UBOkiWhlrugtdTEg8lLeEUk9XyE5ZEa5lKAh3bHPYr5yvhB vVgagRlG2309fWQ+wTKdF70hg8pY+CvQzAFLmCO7kITnlGLoyyOuWxD1P fFu1q04xLXO2izHCJZ5yHyu6PhWL2vgZQ+B2pcxjQ755PnKdgGPNPd1vv s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0OAGHgNk6tJXG+/2dsb2JhbABBp1QNd4FAAQEBAQIBEgEnAgEzCQUNAQiBHQEBBA4FIodKoUkBnlmGQgSHWoshhRCLcg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,301,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="8506966"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2011 17:21:55 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com [72.163.62.200]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p71HLtHE022438; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:21:55 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-206.cisco.com ([72.163.62.213]) by xbh-rcd-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:21:55 -0500
Received: from 10.21.122.15 ([10.21.122.15]) by XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com ([72.163.62.213]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([128.107.191.114]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:21:55 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:24:32 -0500
From: Benson Schliesser <bschlies@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
Message-ID: <CA5C4B80.12C93%bschlies@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AcxQb+A0eXHXQ7V5206uQJ0gnfw+3Q==
In-Reply-To: <4E36DD6C.1070005@lacnic.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2011 17:21:55.0255 (UTC) FILETIME=[82C6A470:01CC506F]
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:21:51 -0000

On 8/1/11 12:07 PM, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> wrote:

> I think the geographical discussion is kind of missing the point.

I agree - I was trying to joke.
(email is a bad medium for sarcasm; sorry.)

> - The venue was great
> - The city was awesome
> - Organization & logistics were also great

Definitely, 100% on these comments. I look forward to visiting Quebec again.

> - Flying to Quebec was reasonable. Maybe my perception is skewed, but I
> didn't find the connections to QC unnaceptable.

Quebec airport didn't have as many options as I would have liked. But it was
adequate, and we all managed the trip ok - good tradeoff to visit a
beautiful city.

Cheers,
-Benson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email