Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 01 August 2011 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E0A5E8015 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.453, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZlXGJN95rUN for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11955E8010 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p71Nq25M027940 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E373C22.5090500@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:52:02 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Kessens <david.kessens@nsn.com>
References: <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011106280.3518@joyce.lan> <67CD028F-3C38-4036-B130-EBD47B6F2AAE@isi.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011122330.3518@joyce.lan> <4E36D701.50704@isi.edu> <BLU0-SMTP35E2581DD81DD01B8CD1F5D0380@phx.gbl> <20110801201029.GC25922@nsn.com> <B6DA3980-6FAE-40C6-A1C8-6F3FFFDC2641@network-heretics.com> <20110801233000.GK25922@nsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110801233000.GK25922@nsn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:52:12 -0000

On 8/1/2011 4:30 PM, David Kessens wrote:
>
> Keith,
>
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:15PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>>
>> Seriously, given that we're committed to having meetings all over the
>> world, do these details really rise to the level of things that the planning
>> staff needs to think about?
>
> You might call them details, but if you end up spending pretty much the same
> amount of time and money traveling within north america, as compared to
> traveling to asia or europe, there is very little meaning left to trying to
> spread the pain of travel around by having a meeting schedule that schedules
> meetings in three different regions.

That's my conclusion.

FWIW, Santa Barbara was mentioned jokingly, but would have been 
infinitely easier to get to -- huge numbers of flights to LAX and an 
"airbus" that goes between the two in under two hours 16x a day.

Joe