IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B571F0C4E for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98TDWGR7AMR2 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F971F0C49 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LP900EYVUKH2S@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for 81attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:00:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LP9007YDUKHT4@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for 81attendees@ietf.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:00:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ACU91533; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:00:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.95) by szxeml206-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:00:14 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.148]) by szxeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([169.254.27.188]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:00:15 +0800
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:00:13 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <BC868E5A-54A9-4EBD-A95B-527E22421A87@cisco.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.193.34.81]
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Message-id: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A873C1AC@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-index: AQHMTy0ZU2NE47IgUkuzObzSk/PybZUG10nR//+o7ICAAAcDgIAAcpyAgAENoICAAAaKgIAACPkAgACHgDA=
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4D3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <35029755-4F66-4ACD-A76B-3EE47D5ABFD7@cisco.com> <A9866519-006F-4A41-A94B-C3CC05971934@thomasclausen.org> <BC868E5A-54A9-4EBD-A95B-527E22421A87@cisco.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:02:21 -0700
Cc: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:00:12 -0000

Fully support. I'm sure the work will be progressed more smoothly in the beach. 
It is also convenient for people going from northern California where all these companies are located to southern California.


Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html


-----Original Message-----
From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 3:53 PM
To: Thomas Heide Clausen
Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!


On Aug 1, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

> ps:  Having an IETF in Santa Barbara would actually be a splendid idea: even though I likely would have two or three connections, I can quite easily imagine quite enjoying a beach-BOF or two....

:-)
_______________________________________________
81attendees mailing list
81attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email