Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)

George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Tue, 09 August 2011 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1B721F86C2 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.193, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWTHXUJdTX0q for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ADF21F8581 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dynamic170.apnic.net (dynamic170.apnic.net [203.119.42.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BF2B675B; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <p06240601ca664c0136fa@loud.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 12:39:26 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5C09CBC-5DED-4691-89E3-83E5124E4656@apnic.net>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <CAFgODJfSOHdt-Lzz6bpnHSCSi5kLMu3Yjjh2xU5b35Dtwm5tRw@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076127BF@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <CAFgODJecoePK7RX=+4DpwZ93qKE1HvjBq7vPOEkToxy0LfnOXg@mail.gmail.com> <FF871B758C55949D49F19663@PST.JCK.COM> <p0624061aca6632f15733@loud.pensive.org> <CAFgODJcgVbEQt0V7wJ9VOjdUvU=hArCiuyn8dOM7TBqVcS=q=Q@mail.gmail.com> <p06240601ca664c0136fa@loud.qualcomm.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:39:08 -0000

an awful lot of stuff about IETF 'now' can be covered off by 'its not your grand-dads IETF'

A Comrade (he might not thank me for it so he shall remain nameless) spoke up in a meeting I was in about succession planning. IETF needs succession planning. 

Part of succession planning is bringing new, younger blood in, and if that means BoFs with more tire kickers and more people, and more questions which old timers think are silly, then thats the price you pay for HAVING a succession plan.

so, I am a big +1 on this.

We need more blood. IETF vampires vant your young blood...

-G