IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <lufang@cisco.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lufang@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19AC21F8CBE for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.694, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgdhV2B+fP4w for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F1421F8CBC for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=lufang@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312219797; x=1313429397; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=Bax6WakN/42ZZY7GHyauF0/WvWFSInfnhOCbC2cKRxs=; b=P1GlyMwy6EohgQioOH/bMJC9N74ajUNUOyA4+c6X+ImqR2k/WqVA422F dp1/34z8XPLYSNLMTrwDI7MYK6z2PPs1vE+z1eUCfEbhM7Rh/vSrtMgVW rkLcQ1UauHc5AgCj92X1DJhpjETR69TQrugGKB9wxqq9YWtZLDmMwnOGQ k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AucCABPiNk6tJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABBmA2PRw13gUABAQEBAgEBAQEPAR0KNAIJBQcEAgEIEQQBAQsGFwEGASYfCQgBAQQBEggah0oEoUABnluFY18Eh1qQMYty
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,301,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="8509702"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2011 17:29:57 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p71HTv9I009047; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:29:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-201.cisco.com ([72.163.62.208]) by xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:29:56 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:29:54 -0500
Message-ID: <238542D917511A45B6B8AA806E875E25068B9BD7@XMB-RCD-201.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA5C4B80.12C93%bschlies@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AcxQb+A0eXHXQ7V5206uQJ0gnfw+3QAAKzaw
References: <4E36DD6C.1070005@lacnic.net> <CA5C4B80.12C93%bschlies@cisco.com>
From: "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <lufang@cisco.com>
To: "Benson Schliesser (bschlies)" <bschlies@cisco.com>, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2011 17:29:56.0656 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1B69B00:01CC5070]
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:29:50 -0000

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Benson Schliesser (bschlies)
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 1:25 PM
To: Carlos M. Martinez
Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!


On 8/1/11 12:07 PM, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> wrote:

> I think the geographical discussion is kind of missing the point.

I agree - I was trying to joke.
(email is a bad medium for sarcasm; sorry.)

> - The venue was great
> - The city was awesome
> - Organization & logistics were also great

Definitely, 100% on these comments. I look forward to visiting Quebec
again.

> - Flying to Quebec was reasonable. Maybe my perception is skewed, but
I
> didn't find the connections to QC unnaceptable.

Quebec airport didn't have as many options as I would have liked. But it
was
adequate, and we all managed the trip ok - good tradeoff to visit a
beautiful city.

Cheers,
-Benson

_______________________________________________
81attendees mailing list
81attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email