IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C469611E8071 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.314, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AG8Nk8-m02Pc for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954C11E8070 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:52:09 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "<81attendees@ietf.org>" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:52:07 -0700
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
Thread-Index: AcxP1fSbNu4k2ao9T5WOJy+xeVpoMgAOIXGg
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF4D3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <DB9C80EF-5231-40B9-B9A9-D0EFB3744DC7@isi.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:52:04 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 81attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:81attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joe Touch
> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 4:02 PM
> To: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: <81attendees@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
> 
> -1
> 
> A city with a real set of international connections is better (eg
> Vancouver)

Since Quebec City has direct flights to Montreal, Toronto, Newark and Chicago, all of which are major intercontinental hubs, I'd say it has plenty of international connections.

Anyway, I find I'm easily able to forgive a little transit inconvenience such as having to change planes in exchange for a highly productive meeting and functional venue, and Quebec City certainly qualifies.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email