IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C129F21F8751 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <KxU9eeWDhkzL>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxU9eeWDhkzL for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE6E21F86C3 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=rg+ietf@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1312768479; x=1344304479; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:date:to:from: subject:cc:content-type:x-random-sig-tag; z=Message-Id:=20<p06240615ca64ef188ba4@loud.pensive.org> |In-Reply-To:=20<0D5B0A71-7BE6-433A-86E0-499B2B0D66E0@fug ue.com>|References:=20<4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com>=0D=0A=20 <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com>=0D=0A =20<80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.n sn-intra.net>=0D=0A=20<3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26 D9@softarmor.com>=0D=0A=20<alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420. 20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu=0D=0A=20siness.ne t>=09<4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net>=0D=0A=20<CA6BA2FE-13 E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com>=0D=0A=20<744D8CA9-9C 01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com>=0D=0A=20<p06240611ca 64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org>=0D=0A=20<0D5B0A71-7BE6-433A- 86E0-499B2B0D66E0@fugue.com>|X-Mailer:=20Eudora=20for=20M ac=20OS=20X|Date:=20Sun,=207=20Aug=202011=2018:43:01=20-0 700|To:=20Ted=20Lemon=20<mellon@fugue.com>|From:=20Randal l=20Gellens=20<rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20[81 attendees]=20are=20we=20getting=20complacent?=20Good=20jo b!|Cc:=20<81attendees@ietf.org>|Content-Type:=20text/plai n=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii"=20=3B=20format=3D"flowed" |X-Random-Sig-Tag:=201.0b28; bh=VajOKAmCNabr5tHEPsdw8u5H/yRXS+3+zJ1tBqm9iE8=; b=WyOFjhK9LZFdjhBAzzKuQ7KnSmESXl6Fbx307lda85Pmx/KvVtZSqho3 5ptyuMx/HJ2ZzcMZQAdUEsrUQxUlsxTZNbuH6gqcxTLu0AVS64NU1k/nK ERZpiC3V4B+wCkqbyBD4sFew5XOBqodWVGh92rOfDgI8LkYDPP3vS4u5Z A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6431"; a="108695372"
Received: from ironmsg03-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2011 18:54:38 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,333,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="59451467"
Received: from warlock.qualcomm.com ([129.46.50.49]) by Ironmsg03-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Aug 2011 18:54:38 -0700
Received: from loud.pensive.org (myvpn-r-710.ras.qualcomm.com [10.64.2.198]) by warlock.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id p781sanS028747; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:54:38 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240615ca64ef188ba4@loud.pensive.org>
In-Reply-To: <0D5B0A71-7BE6-433A-86E0-499B2B0D66E0@fugue.com>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108011727420.20499@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbu siness.net> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <0D5B0A71-7BE6-433A-86E0-499B2B0D66E0@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:43:01 -0700
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] are we getting complacent? Good job!
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:54:14 -0000

At 8:35 PM -0400 8/7/11, Ted Lemon wrote:

>  Sure, but why did you have to avoid the overnight?   You just flew 
> to Japan from the U.S. (I assume).   That's a heck of a long 
> flight.   Why not sleep in Tokyo and continue on to Hiroshima the 
> next day?  You're just going to have to sleep in Hiroshima anyway, 
> and the train to Hiroshima is _fast_.

Fast as it may be, it's still a lot of time.  I'd rather have that 
time in the destination.

>>  I disagree and find the statement patronizing.  Doing research can 
>>  allow one to attempt to select the best option, but that may still
>>  involve problems.
>
>  Sure.   If you don't want to have travel problems, don't travel.

I was objecting to your statement that only those people who 
neglected to do any research experienced problems.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Cats aren't clean, they're just covered with cat spit.
                                    --John S. Nichols

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email