Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)

Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.ac.kr> Tue, 09 August 2011 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689EB21F8AFE for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=1.39, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqWzvBDhhSPF for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966421F8AFD for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1563144gxk.31 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 04:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ErfT8ewj14VjOhWwQszDTlbKCI9bWAgq/vfoS9IGEP0=; b=j51JoI+LRjxX2QMFk48IMtkhsh/J1kgRypr3HV7BxRFqkQ/3myxdC69XZIBcjSacIl 79Pl4RQLhp7MzK99Jcvgd8FgFS9DOxvEja83yt4xSeAVlu9/Zc7kNK0+FGSUyzeKNHGV 9pWD8qCU5u23X2dTbIdKSMT9d7NfnEA3pJU7w=
Received: by 10.150.209.6 with SMTP id h6mr6856036ybg.308.1312890610079; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 04:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.43.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7687F89E-43D1-4A13-BC17-63FA5E5F0CCE@cs.georgetown.edu>
References: <4E34C3A9.2020502@att.com> <A5B9F059BE69461F8008EBECD84A1E67@china.huawei.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402713C27@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <3DA9637F-1C72-43CB-B040-49F2A6FF26D9@softarmor.com> <4E398F03.1000806@dcrocker.net> <CA6BA2FE-13E7-438F-B943-7659A37DB3C5@cisco.com> <744D8CA9-9C01-41A5-A22C-CDF2F4E904EF@fugue.com> <p06240611ca64d0f07a2b@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108072112110.14256@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <p06240601ca65afd19752@loud.pensive.org> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1108080830460.18801@sjc-vpn7-506.cisco.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D213914A1EBA927@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <CAFgODJfSOHdt-Lzz6bpnHSCSi5kLMu3Yjjh2xU5b35Dtwm5tRw@mail.gmail.com> <B819AC736B2D3745ADEA0C285E020CEB076127BF@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com> <m239hb7iww.wl%randy@psg.com> <7687F89E-43D1-4A13-BC17-63FA5E5F0CCE@cs.georgetown.edu>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.ac.kr>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:49:50 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cN8OAfelfIRoU_8t7sXgf088RAQ
Message-ID: <CAFgODJeY-dNisxxJse2N4N7av_=QQnxWwsdotkA8bOGAmPgw-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Burger Eric <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd379a671598604aa112a52"
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] diverse meeting locations (was: are we getting complacent? Good job!)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:49:42 -0000

Agreed.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Burger Eric <eburger@cs.georgetown.edu>wrote:

> Maybe not regular meetings in Africa, but it would be great to have at
> least a meeting in Africa.
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> >> I'm not arguing that we should not hold meetings in diverse locations,
> >> but with your logic we should hold regular IETF meetings in Africa
> >
> > one might be a good idea
> >
> > randy
> > _______________________________________________
> > 81attendees mailing list
> > 81attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 81attendees mailing list
> 81attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees
>
>


-- 
DY