Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083C121F874C for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.644
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLcrlP7ZrRI2 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33A421F8745 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Qohku-00083C-D9; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:09:28 -0400
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:09:27 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <3CE2B5A82FD936D78D8F2534@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <20110803200037.GA36147@shinkuro.com>
References: <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <9D00CDB7-2C04-446E-8D53-0552BAEE22EE@juniper.net> <633EAF31-607E-4FEF-B502-5FFAD89BF01A@juniper.net> <4E371370.40804@freedesktop.org> <B06422CA0C9ACCF2FA7EB048@PST.JCK.COM> <3DB5933F-4C22-42F9-A222-9CF02F199850@network-heretics.com> <20110803191608.GJ31442@shinkuro.com> <F2757D2E-C4CF-4C55-A3B0-759D830DB5FD@network-heretics.com> <20110803200037.GA36147@shinkuro.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:09:35 -0000

--On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 16:00 -0400 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:34:58PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>> 
>> Though this might fit within its charter, homenet's problems
>> are a lot bigger than that.
>> 
> 
> Among others, interested participants can't get in the room :)

I assumed that was just testing a congestion-reduction mechanism
based on a restricted entry model.  New people could get in only
when older ones left.   Not quite token-passing, but close.

Pretty successful experiment, too.  

   john