Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810A421F8B7E for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.170, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgSln8Nhy+UX for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9C21F8B74 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B12B20375; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:35:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:35:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=UjOZaSThZcr3MqOm6ojTfugFeFo=; b=W+ mfYnxb8z7kh+GDVmjSmqSR+fDgxsAT/OAtvwjwqzhQsQSuGpSN/Y9HMEZv7VMV5Y FMscdKuE0Es/CGt0dqDXu9090SRbc9g/cJJaz6Slq2mxu3ae3lPF0ACcuqiu9w6w IZWiUZpRij8UhilmHbtsiZRT5fB6kUt5VT1cd/A8c=
X-Sasl-enc: 4jwZWdJshLmwwZQVzpFRGVG4frQf0StgskGnYQdtTJl8 1312400100
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DD3CF457C79; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 15:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110803191608.GJ31442@shinkuro.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:34:58 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F2757D2E-C4CF-4C55-A3B0-759D830DB5FD@network-heretics.com>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <9D00CDB7-2C04-446E-8D53-0552BAEE22EE@juniper.net> <633EAF31-607E-4FEF-B502-5FFAD89BF01A@juniper.net> <4E371370.40804@freedesktop.org> <B06422CA0C9ACCF2FA7EB048@PST.JCK.COM> <3DB5933F-4C22-42F9-A222-9CF02F199850@network-heretics.com> <20110803191608.GJ31442@shinkuro.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:34:51 -0000

On Aug 3, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 05:48:36PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>> It might help even more if someone wanted to take on the task of writing a document called "Recommendations for Buffer and Congestion Management in Consumer-Grade Routers"
> 
> There's a whole working group with exactly that problem on its plate,
> unless I misread the charter of homenet quite incorrectly.  

Though this might fit within its charter, homenet's problems are a lot bigger than that.

Keith