Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)

Monty Montgomery <monty@xiph.org> Mon, 01 August 2011 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <xiphmont@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5B31F0C4B for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMKvjWcxyqVX for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D666D1F0C49 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so4074319wwe.13 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4ax+MtU7sCrgQ2r48hvdb5UhlI1kfgPxsc2zMLSqp7w=; b=kp3fImgo/BO3aRVNXIuhjCO8X6y8kCMuP3uPuXWXW8InPM3H295eWZiapXBMbXYohk tZysXtVw5u7YrNh8kufdX6SS9UBsP75x466e39qjc7Xxux3+9PIp4iLWYIgZKYPXVBqH 94VxkzeG2smEwVlDa5Q0Tq4fnx4akwHkvRsCw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.3.4 with SMTP id 4mr6675091wbl.35.1312235385429; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: xiphmont@gmail.com
Received: by 10.227.136.82 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <98F2DACCFC679BFB8A8E3592@PST.JCK.COM>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <9D00CDB7-2C04-446E-8D53-0552BAEE22EE@juniper.net> <633EAF31-607E-4FEF-B502-5FFAD89BF01A@juniper.net> <4E371370.40804@freedesktop.org> <00E8AAF99E25FF49A1F55E9A0CD19EBCB93DF4E65B@SGSINSXCHMBSA2.sg.alcatel-lucent.com> <CE4DBD9C-E366-400B-9B39-F86D591F25AB@juniper.net> <98F2DACCFC679BFB8A8E3592@PST.JCK.COM>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:49:45 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9D0JsRjLei8NeyONJFy5FGpl9HE
Message-ID: <CACrD=+9110fGkFJq4y5aPfSeF8NLEW6jqcfD25qAGob8mT-mdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Monty Montgomery <monty@xiph.org>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 81attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:49:39 -0000

> Sigh.
> I used the network in the Delta quite a lot and didn't
> experience much of a problem, but kept my expectations set for
> "hotel" rather than "IETF".  I also mostly used the wired
> Ethernet -- it may be just anecdotal, but I've generally found
> that wired Ethernet is much less likely to be problematic than
> WiFi if neither is set up by experts.

I will note that for four of the six nights I was there, the wired
ethernet in all three of our groups' rooms at the Delta (on three
different floors) was unusable, with ping indicating packet loss over
50% and latencies in the seconds range during the periods where there
was any connectivity at all.  Wireless obviously didn't work either.
I camped at other hotels and various coffeeshops to read mail (we had
a fourth at the Palace Royal; wireless there was fine).

Several folks have repeated the 'just use the wired ethernet' advice,
and I'm sure it ~worked for some.  For the Xiph contingent at the
Delta it was somewhere between badly impacted and nonfunctional for
the entire stay.

Monty