IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Wed, 27 July 2011 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5547221F8B87 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teM99gNi9ME7 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E992021F8B86 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6REGRhs012001 for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:16:27 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk p6REGRhs012001
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1311776188; bh=Ue5HwzkMs66nbktmnizJylJPxEs=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=TRLwi85cCO5n8Qzg5f4z2uE3sb7bJ1G2uWeTgzvWL/Cc2ADtkcTBZTxnaXXCcrGiR RG8xmH1CzB3Em8qL+r0dP4LHuu9y8T1xgI+1m+NYF9nq8XeegbE+7AG85SWxU6x1Q/ AzzYjupvFGgSv5Ff9jmbh2lNJqJ+tX8YE9YMFW3M=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP id n6QFGR036614399780 ret-id none; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:16:27 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::112:85b9:1fc:89ed:63b2] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:112:85b9:1fc:89ed:63b2]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6REG0cb010411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:16:01 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:16:01 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|00dd9a1d56236d3fc19ed27627eee401n6QFGR03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <89602A94-989B-4013-9947-0733AFDD60EA@network-heretics.com> <5104FDC225AB4EAFB44F3EBB5B1ED25F@china.huawei.com> <CACrD=+9zp5-471K78g2A1yp-Hb3S4Pq67SkAUWmAm2whqNdJeA@mail.gmail.com> <9C81D273-BB00-4AFE-8F62-92B94014927C@townsley.net> <44A4D0F6-4775-4C8B-848F-F65271F0C043@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=n6QFGR036614399700; tid=n6QFGR036614399780; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: p6REGRhs012001
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:16:35 -0000

On 27 Jul 2011, at 05:45, Mark Townsley wrote:

> 
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Monty Montgomery wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Michael Ko <Michael@huaweisymantec.com> wrote:
>>> Have you tried the wired connection using the Ethernet cable in the room?
>>> It seems to work fine for me.
>> 
>> That's what we're trying to use here.  We can get to Google services,
>> oddly enough, but almost nothing else.  We're seeing > 50% packet loss
>> and latencies in the seconds range.
> 
> Same here. Quite bad. 

Interesting, I've not seen any significant issues, compared to typical hotel networks.  It certainly seems better first thing in the morning, when I guess less people are online.

I managed to watch the German F1 race via BBC iPlayer just fine ... or maybe it was me eating all the bandwidth ;)

Is the Hilton's bandwidth being boosted by additional equipment for the week?

Tim

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email