Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)

"JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A1721F8B73 for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.620, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlM6+Mi0D7EV for <81attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B52921F8B6E for <81attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-250-11-31.lucent.com [135.250.11.31]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p71LBkNC027019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 16:11:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from SGSINSXCHHUB02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com (sgsinsxchhub02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com [135.254.109.72]) by inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p71LBjOD029951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 02:41:45 +0530
Received: from SGSINSXCHMBSA2.sg.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.254.109.78]) by SGSINSXCHHUB02.sg.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.254.109.72]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 05:11:45 +0800
From: "JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>, Maciek Konstantynowicz <maciek@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 05:11:42 +0800
Thread-Topic: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)
Thread-Index: AcxQjcgmL3/zzKtJSNeDhhWHltfdFAAAUHMw
Message-ID: <00E8AAF99E25FF49A1F55E9A0CD19EBCB93DF4E65B@SGSINSXCHMBSA2.sg.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4E2CC532.3090209@sunet.se> <4E2CCE72.3010500@sunet.se> <4E2E2236.2060808@sunet.se> <87EC2139-C7C2-4113-97E2-9EB9DA2406EA@juniper.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107262259400.80739@joyce.lan> <9D00CDB7-2C04-446E-8D53-0552BAEE22EE@juniper.net> <633EAF31-607E-4FEF-B502-5FFAD89BF01A@juniper.net> <4E371370.40804@freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E371370.40804@freedesktop.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: "81attendees@ietf.org" <81attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [81attendees] sucky Delta hotel network (and bufferbloat)
X-BeenThere: 81attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 81 Attendee List <81attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/81attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:81attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/81attendees>, <mailto:81attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:11:45 -0000

Jim Gettys wrote:

> So hotels and conferences are particularly fruitful places to see 
> Internet illnesses of all sorts.  The one exception to the conference 
> problems I've seen is NANOG/IETF, where cluefull people have done 
> useful classification and AQM setup and where there is lots of 
> traffic via enterprise access points that aren't over buffered, so 
> that even RED93 algorithms can succeed at controlling the queues.  
> Would that someone would write up that configuration and publish it as 
> a BCP: it would at least help other conferences and enterprises to do 
> much better, while we sort out the home router mess which needs other 
> AQM algorithms, as yet untested.

Anton Kapela gave a lightning talk at NANOG38 on improving the wireless 
performance. Available at:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog38/presentations/kapela.pdf

regards,
aj