[85attendees] Experiment
Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> Sun, 28 October 2012 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9D921F8611 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uL5Qcgnoa5Vq for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EF221F860C for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:a51e:6f0a:3137:87ff] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:a51e:6f0a:3137:87ff]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F04320483 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <508D8436.4030702@petit-huguenin.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:02 -0700
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121027 Icedove/10.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [85attendees] Experiment
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:15:04 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I would like to do some experiments to check the feasibility of extending the IETF network to hotels that are not directly connected to the meeting venue. Last time in Vancouver my room was at the Sheraton, with the usual crappy Internet connection that seems the norm in all hotels around the world. That room was in direct line of sight of the Hyatt, so it made me thinking that it could have been possible to establish a wireless link between the two hotels. This time I have a room at the main hotel, so I'll bring with me a pair of Ubiquiti Nanostation LOCO M5, and try to verify connectivity with as many hotels in line of sight as possible. Obviously we cannot start to coordinate this until I know where my room will be at the Hilton, but I'll send an email Sunday afternoon after check-in. Meanwhile there is one thing that people interested can help with. If we manage to establish line-of-sight, we'll still have to solve the problem of redistributing the IETF network inside the remote hotels to the IETF participants. A friend of mine tried using Powerline Ethernet (Netgear) without any success in a Westin hotel (even between rooms on the same floor), but we probably need to test more hotels to see if this really cannot work, so I'll also bring with me 4 powerline adapters. Other solutions that can be tried are Ethernet over Coax (using the TV distribution system) or Ethernet over the phone system (HomePNA). Another solution is a mesh wireless network, but that probably requires access stations with dual radios. Anyway if you have this kind of hardware and can bring it with you, perhaps we can do more testing and find a workable solution for IETF 86. Thanks. - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQjYQ0AAoJECnERZXWan7EI/MP/iyzH+0yIApn7k3ai8fDVX3b OprSp1cZ+Wl8a9tQFqrtiGhPLM9meSmr1z2UEzyAei+81ti5z8CUne0APN/7wzZG h1PqPvZ+6bnFjWP1iELUqYgw08gbbMmo1OR+LYfEjP55y1Dr6tqPT6eWlDW9oNox 88bcckEp2fBsBHblN9ARGpNeXr8oWHERK4ugK54QJO+6zIR/bYcNxjbS7Za0YNY2 WmFxHQjUJC95yh/jDballDdgp1JrlZW9iL3UIrXsPl0WS8g+2xqJIh5sa0ReGS+t fkECUrsIwRO4IXAHF5Tmb1j6B276SCvUmmVVCFXBp8lU8ZP3puoOyNMhr8pWhtjz OcVK2G6K5HVSb3/v5qRogT18D2UFGvkdpD/pT9Ko6NUgyva+Kwrv+8iMUUca8bIb vwjSIzSvmqGaZZXu6F7bkDiNKohvNrYdoQT1LRK/9lvdsPJxc4/FATcBHEFXN9k2 xHeTMCMFPQTF5SQVd0tI0f19Qrsw8LqZJ5AakVKVFmN+3nLkYfgVsn9vR7/8Ut4c kr3Yj7dvzxjUW4YeTAfw1gHtYFcCjDeweJoz90L1qi2sNX5n/F+ZTvTtUg6YXSZM K32yWQ8EsfdA1D3Cz9HrLK14gga3uQDerC+RvmnAr0XqFfokbU67VK9aETHk6zQ2 Vz6rIBaMWSp1IpHWSy5U =fLuV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [85attendees] Experiment Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] Experiment Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [85attendees] Experiment Sharam Hakimi
- Re: [85attendees] Experiment Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [85attendees] Experiment James Miller