Re: [93attendees] To all presenters: choose correct examples for IP prefixes and domain names

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Wed, 05 August 2015 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1BA1B30BD for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_SPCALS=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TTvHuYXkB9ot for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDEE1B30C7 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:41:59 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:41:59 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] To all presenters: choose correct examples for IP prefixes and domain names
Thread-Index: AQHQw8RI+PwfWDXfKUeqqcU2mxXGqp391TwA
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:41:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D1E7A4F2.DE88%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20150721144714.GA9039@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150721144714.GA9039@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.3.150624
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3521619708_19896780"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/UWCRTzH4SN3Vx2c8tnqSlqAnpaQ>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] To all presenters: choose correct examples for IP prefixes and domain names
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:42:03 -0000

On 7/21/15, 16:47, "93attendees on behalf of Stephane Bortzmeyer"
<93attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> wrote:

>We have IP prefixes dedicated for documentation, examples and WG
>presentations. They are reserved in an IANA registry
><http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-spec
>ial-registry.xml>
><http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-spec
>ial-registry.xml>
>created by RFC 6890 (such as 198.51.100.0/24 or 2001:db8::/32).

I am not sure what email list is most appropriate to ask, but my question
is a follow up to this.

Does "::ffff:192.0.2.1" qualify as fit for publication as an example?

RFC 6890:

192.0.2.0/24 IPv4 address is "TEST-NET-1"

::ffff:0:0/96 is "IPv4-mapped Address"


Or maybe - 2001:db8::ffff:192.0.2.1 ?  (But that isn't a mapped address
given the reservation in 6890.)