IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [97attendees] Liked the Shared Conference Room

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFE012941A for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BjMidFPvLIJ for <97attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD2412960C for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p66so89293254pga.2 for <97attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VLIHwip+9YksVON6iaETPFBVu5lYyBwFbsO6ws3ira0=; b=wd/BRUKy/7CDQkNbgovo1u+Uu+dfXPA+ZKjYzG1OxC3eHh08msVuVJoZ9OWtoWDUqP PvWTRKd4UgvGBmIomf/TXa2rEXuiWM6NrBG5PI1XYaMVs/8CYv67oGrz/UjLquTlFmos HBPpEOXI5tbcLaKcfijPCLnqDeVQplVrk/9fr6UG+7IXmzXZRth64lWxPyPLHkvj9KIO ppxFvd/rlMdbYfZUUDjFPwvfVOgLr8dWa249qvef/vlY63idxoEIly6yY0wImRzmSZKu lcLyqHGM9QAyThOcnz2DaqGULCELiOnKmdGyU8ayZlMqZRLNh2dLOqXEpHliK4qU6V0b I8lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VLIHwip+9YksVON6iaETPFBVu5lYyBwFbsO6ws3ira0=; b=hCYPDhV4Raz30SmBiSbUhVdhGT3JHgeNG0va7FsnMfRQP+kpwNeay32eWokGhPiktL oKV6JmpeOpv7eHZ3mcgaVQlbfCgrtyK5qwUyejYaPhpnDPJSiPA+NaV1+BtJqrRrkWMK D1BO91FfQ7/s9MDj9dgzc7dGbbabxZMHrEOM7h2bkQ3eIFXmQW71ntpD+JOmlaK7PGKZ k20ytaqqkaULidikeeV4RHodHQkQx2kaVnOcZEUIlc0yvnCulX3vQe1T6cWCvd3l8/AR h2uNFDrNUNEN+kqoxhGxS132rxy/9XFRWr1rIXMyE9jrWdhZJe4gIvEhD4MHBAH9ZtkA KW9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfj97ha5N4EDlPh9/DOLv5M9NcypT+UqmuxX+tDMUBaoYjupIM9w+ZP6gJpPemmug==
X-Received: by 10.99.230.83 with SMTP id p19mr4960422pgj.121.1479371098197; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:144:d029:9d24:c2f0:eef? (t2001067c03700144d0299d24c2f00eef.hotel-wired.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:144:d029:9d24:c2f0:eef]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p64sm4305977pfi.88.2016.11.17.00.24.56 for <97attendees@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:24:57 -0800 (PST)
To: 97attendees@ietf.org
References: <EA2116C2-B17A-45BD-B0F1-17BA562D0A7E@cable.comcast.com> <1E5278AD-9499-4E1B-80F9-D582A2BEFE55@gmail.com> <8445456c11e249d69a45af96ceae1d17@NXMDA2.org.apnic.net> <CAA=nHSJ6RbNAykG6frFfeZ30NDjF9416PUM1rO9ew8fFWUe20g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <9c03f3e9-cc7d-02d6-3159-29cf68cc8dd6@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:25:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAA=nHSJ6RbNAykG6frFfeZ30NDjF9416PUM1rO9ew8fFWUe20g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/97attendees/6A_5-s4oWswTDAdqGL9FAz0-TEY>
Subject: Re: [97attendees] Liked the Shared Conference Room
X-BeenThere: 97attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 97 attendees that have opted in on this list." <97attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/97attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:97attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees>, <mailto:97attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:25:10 -0000

On 11/17/2016 2:53 AM, George Michaelson wrote:
> Used it, appreciated it. I suspect as word spreads we'll find we want 
> more, and this begs many questions about what IETF is, because these 
> things, ephemeral meetings we all do, are becoming a stronger driver 
> than WG activity for some people.
>
> The assumption we want more of these short-term-use easy private 
> access spaces begs questions I don't think I understand.


I think the hallway (bar, breakfast, bathroom, smoke break) meetings 
have always been a strong driver for IETF attendees. This is just 
enabling perhaps a more comfortable (or less awkward!) spot to chat.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email