Re: [97attendees] Liked the Shared Conference Room

Used it, appreciated it. I suspect as word spreads we'll find we want more,
and this begs many questions about what IETF is, because these things,
ephemeral meetings we all do, are becoming a stronger driver than WG
activity for some people.

The assumption we want more of these short-term-use easy private access
spaces begs questions I don't think I understand.

On 17 November 2016 at 16:40, Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote:

> +1. We used it several times to brief people about new drafts. It was a
> good way to bring some newcomers into the work and sort out some concerns
> with a smaller group.
>
> Phil
>
> > On Nov 17, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I used it once, it was very helpful.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Livingood, Jason <
> Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I cannot recall if this was done before – maybe I just noticed it. But
> I liked the sharedshort team meeting, where otherwise we’d have used a
> hotel room or more open space. If this is a new thing, please keep it up.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 97attendees mailing list
> >> 97attendees@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 97attendees mailing list
> > 97attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>
> _______________________________________________
> 97attendees mailing list
> 97attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/97attendees
>